Jump to content

User talk:24.133.120.222

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at The Curtain Hits the Cast. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Ones and Sixes, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at The Invisible Way. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — sparklism hey! 20:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unsourced changes, obscenity in edit summaries, no response to warnings. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA IS ANNOYING!!!

[edit]

With no freedom to my editings, and no freedom to whatever I do, EdJohnston has found me and said that I have vandalised everything. CAN WE ALL FORGET ABOUT THIS??? WHY ARE YOU GUYS SO HEARTLESS????

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to What It Is (Mark Knopfler song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I DID NOTHING WRONG!!! I DID NOTHING WRONG!!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.133.120.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I DID NOTHING WRONG!!!, IVANVVECTOR, YOU'LL PAY FOR THIS!!

Decline reason:

Disruptive requests are not considered. 331dot (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.133.120.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Is it too late now? IS IT REALLY TOO LATE????} THIS MUST BE A PUNISHMENT THAT LASTS FOREVER!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you make further unproductive requests, especially with shouting, you will lose access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.133.120.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just edited something and you guys took it too far, please understand that you guys are abusing me

Decline reason:

Do this again and you'll lose access to this talk page. Stop it. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You cannot remove prior declined requests until the block is removed. Please do not do this again. 331dot (talk) 15:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • sobs* okay.
You still have not addressed the reason for the block, personal attacks. You won't be unblocked until you can convince another administrator that you will no longer make personal attacks. Accusing others of "abusing you" is not helpful. 331dot (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I... am... sorry!

I have done nothing wrong...

But now I will not hurt anyone.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.133.120.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just wanted to edit, I learnt my mistakes

Decline reason:

You will need to be more expansive than that. Please address the exact reason you were blocked, and how your behavior will change going forward. Not just platitudes, we need specifics. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 22:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As promised, I have revoked your talk page access. I implemented this via a two week page protection. --Yamla (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.