Jump to content

User talk:GuardianH

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ne dine jamais en ville, Louise Dubreau


DYK for Bork tapes

On 14 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bork tapes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that judge Robert Bork's leaked list of video rentals included movies such as Citizen Kane, The Philadelphia Story and Sixteen Candles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bork tapes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bork tapes), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 12,400 views (1,033.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GalliumBot, These picture have been for more that 15 years maybe. Few were added recently. Should I create a new heading with Education, Lectures and Visits in Pictures. I will appreciate guidance. Thanks Surance (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Influences

I see that on 24th August 2022 you edited the influences parameter for Steven Pinker. I don't suppose they bothered to tell you, but as part of a massive purge involving at least 3000 articles the influences and influenced parameters were removed by PrimeBot in the last few days. If you have any thoughts about this there is a discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_scientist#Influences/influenced_--_abuse_of_power Athel cb (talk) 12:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgers/Braves infobox photo

Not sure I know what the point is of making it smaller, since what dictates width in that infobox is the 26 innings of line score and at least from my perspective, making it smaller just increases whitespace and makes it harder to read. Wehwalt (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no doubt that making the image a huge size makes it more visible, but it actually makes the article harder to read, rather than easier. A fine balance between good chunks of paragraph and portrait is best — with an image of that size, the paragraphs are far too squished. GuardianH (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see that it makes the paragraphs any less squished because the line score (the inning-by-inning) is what is making the infobox so wide and doing the squishing. Perhaps it depends on what skin you use? Wehwalt (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for your considerable efforts to assure balance in the C.T. article. Thanks also for including the Jackson quote. Though I have respected him immensely, I never thought of him, one way or the other, as being possessed with a sense of humor. ____

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

Hi GuardianH, we know each other from higher-ed stuff. You really know your way around Wikipedia. I am no newcomer, myself, with more than 10,000 edits in German and English, but I do have questions from time to time. Mainly it has to do with conflict resolution, the quest for better referencing, puff reduction and so on. Could you take me on as a mentee for these areas? -- Melchior2006 (talk) 07:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Melchior2006, I'm unfortunately not the best mentor for such issues, and I fear that I would mislead you in some areas — there are editors much more versed in discussion and conflict resolution than myself. Most of my work is usually a passion project, and as such I try to best avoid any direct conflict. However, I'm always open for the questions, and I'm always willing to collab with you on article! With the amount of stuff on the site, it seems to me that the best teacher is experience; it certainly was for me. GuardianH (talk) 18:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see what you mean. If I have questions, I will write you on an ad hoc basis. Is that ok? And as you say, the best way is learning by doing, so if we can collab on some articles, all the better! --Melchior2006 (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, no worries. GuardianH (talk) 07:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Demers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Above the Law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about maintaining your talk page

Hi GuardianH, I wanted to ask how you deal with unfounded or erroneous comments on your talk page. I noticed that you deleted one recently (I agreed completely with that decision). Do you feel obliged to archive stuff from your talk page? Then there is the "junk mail" one gets from time to time; hardly anyone could argue for archiving that, or what do you say? Thx. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're allowed a great deal of free reign over your talk page. I think there's some editors out there who have never even archived their talk page before; my understanding is that you aren't compelled to do so. It's more of a voluntary cleanup/organization task from time to time. As for comments, I try to respond to them even if they are misguided, so as to see if there is a common ground. GuardianH (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hey GuardianH, I stumbled upon your user page a short while ago — forgive me if it sounds weird, but I think all the stuff you’ve done is just incredible. I was also an Asian-American high schooler from Massachusetts just a short while ago (played a bit of jazz at NEC and All States here too, might be doxxing myself idk lol, maybe I know you?) and I’ve always really liked history (not as rigorous as you, I think) but most of my edits are just me carrying over DOY stuff from other language DOY pages (like Japanese or Chinese) because I don’t feel like I have enough time in college to pore over academic texts. I’d love to hear what your reading/writing process is for Wikipedia as a presumably busy student so I can do more (right now I feel more like I’m filling holes as I see them instead of spending time researching topics and making new pages about them).

P.S. Also, if you end up attending Harvard or MIT I’d love to meet up sometime 😎 Marcustcii (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcustcii Thank you for your kind words. I always wanted to be a historian when I was a kid, and the field I wanted to specialize in was Byzantine history and become a medievalist based off of the stuff I read from Herrin, Goffart, Ostrogorsky, Kazhdan, and other authors of the Oxford tradition. I think that's largely what has informed my writing the most; my personal bias is that the writing style then was so much more elegant that it is now. So I try to replicate their stylistic approach in summary as much as possible, and I think after you get at it for a long time it enters your subconscious. Same goes for research — you develop an eye and taste for content.
I've shifted a little now. I think it would be very difficult to sustain a lifestyle as a medievalist in the academic field now, which is a terrible shame; my personal sympathies to the field remain, although I've transitioned towards constitutional law and all the great figures which have molded that discipline — Scalia, Hand, and the like. It's so similar to medieval history, in a way. I'm laboring away on Henry Friendly (a personal hero of mine) right now. I don't know if looking at it would get my reading/writing process (I'm a terribly messy thinker as evidenced by the log), but, if I were to guess, that would be the page to look at.
I think all the stuff you’ve done is just incredible – I think you are giving me too much credit! I get into a terrible cycle with articles: after some inspiration all I can do for a few days is work on them, become disillusioned, and the writing is actually quite a disappointment. I end up abandoning a lot altogether, leaving their corpses behind (Malone, White, Rand, and countless other casualties). I'd be willing to speak about my process if you're still interested, but I think there really are much better writers than myself on here that could offer greater insight. GuardianH (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Bots out of my watchlist

Hi GuardianH! I have a little question: Can I set parameters somewhere to exclude bot changes from my watchlist? -- Melchior2006 (talk) 12:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Melchior2006 I believe so. I think if you go to Preferences > Watchlist (tab) > Changes shown. GuardianH (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
gotcha! That was easy. Thanks for your help. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Charles Fried

On 30 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Charles Fried, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frederick Banting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cambrai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your "thanks," and for all you do!

Hi GuardianH, what an impressive userpage you've got- you must have a very broad reading list with the topic interests you display and have made contributions to.

I want to thank you not only for your "thanks" on my recent edits (boy howdy, removing that Stossel LISTSPAM was actually quite a feat on the mobile app, which I learned doesn't scroll when you "drag-highlight," lol. I was in too deep to give up, though), but for all the work you do here. As I just posted on ElKevbo's page, the one positive for me in bumping into the disruptive editing from Summerdays1 has been uncovering contributors like yourselves, who are protecting the encyclopedia from sometimes-subtle BOOSTERISM in areas with higher-than-usual "drive-by" edits. You are awesome, and your tireless work is appreciated.

I am a habitual copyeditor (I find it so relaxing, which I recognize might be weird lol) so if you ever come across articles which need text clean-up or just review, and don't have the time or inclination yourself, feel free to tag me in to have a look! Thanks again and happy editing :-D ~Chelsea aka Chiselinccc (talk) 17:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. Copyeditors like you are what keeps articles running for years. GuardianH (talk) 17:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carla Anderson Hills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page B.A.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleanth Brooks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BLitt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael E. Hansen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LLM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to semi-protect your page

The person behind you is obviously using proxies, there is no range that I can block. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Yes, please. Thanks. GuardianH (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Doug Weller talk 14:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for inputs

Greetings @GuardianH

Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles, and also facilitate some discussions. Came across your user profile from related changes to MOS:LEGAL since you may have made edits to Law related articles. Many WP users are not aware of MOS:LEGAL.

I am looking requesting inputs at WT:MOS/LEGAL to begin one more round of discussion to update Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal#Guidelines if the topic would interest you. Thanks Bookku (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Johnson: Admission that there is no theory of intelligent design

On 18th June at 23.31 (one of many edits you did that day) you removed Phillip Johnson's admission that there is no theory of intelligent design. That seems rather important to me, and I don't fully understand your edit summary. Could you explain in more detail why you removed it? Athel cb (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The date for the diff might be different. I couldn't find anything for 18th June 23.31. GuardianH (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The edit information is given as follows:
======
"Revision as of 23:31, 18 June 2024 edit undo thank
GuardianH (talk | contribs)
WP:SYNTH and a lengthy section that provides a soapbox for Johnson
Tag: Visual edit"
======
I don't know how Wikipedia determines the time, so my 23.31 (in France) may be 5.31 PM where you are (or something similar).
Anyway, I can't see how Johnson's admission that he got it wrong can be called "a soapbox for Johnson". From your user page I expect that you are interested in Johnson as a legal scholar whereas I am more interested in his attempts to promote "Intelligent Design" as a serious alternative to natural selection (which it never was, of course). Athel cb (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think the time is different for the diff on my end because of the timezone difference with France. It was removed because (a) the first sentence (In...theory) isn't in the source, which doesn't mention any backtracking by Johnson "in his later years". Quite the contrary. He was a contributor to the Santorum Amendment, and the 2006 article says that It’s clear that Johnson genuinely believes what he writes and espouses. The preceding sentence on a possible transition to being apolitical has only a tentative perhaps and it only concerns a possible political change, rather than a change in his belief in ID. The section on Johnson's ID is a general summary of his views and works, and the 2006 synth quote of a minor comment by Johnson has little coverage for being due. GuardianH (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for your response.
Would you accept it if I reinstate the introduction as follows:
(i) Instead of "In his later years Johnson retreated from his contention that intelligent design was a scientific theory. In an interview in 2006 he described it as follows:" put "In an interview in 2006 Johnson retreated from his contention that intelligent design was a scientific theory, describing it as follows:"
(ii) Replace the dead link with one that works: https://web.archive.org/web/20070609131601/http://sciencereview.berkeley.edu/articles.php?issue=10&article=evolution Athel cb (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...retreated from his contention that intelligent design was a scientific theory what in the source supports this? GuardianH (talk) 02:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't think "I also don’t think that there is really a theory of intelligent design at the present time to propose as a comparable alternative to the Darwinian theory, which is, whatever errors it might contain, a fully worked out scheme" supports this? What wording would you accept? Athel cb (talk) 09:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From a fellow Bay Stater

Salutations @GuardianH!

Hey, I am User:HamiltonthesixXmusic. I used to live in Central Massachusetts, and I was recently doing a deep dive on the Massachusetts wikiportal when I saw that you also hail from the good ol' bury. I believe we also have a common interest in editing pages about American politicians and political issues, as well as some legal professionals.

If you need any help on expanding a project or sourcing information about anything, I am always here to help. Cheers! HamiltonthesixXmusic (talk) 00:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GuardianH&oldid=1239092214"