User talk:Onel5969
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128 |
Edit Count
[edit]Wiki mark-up link
[edit]Hi! You might find these handy:
Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Other useful links
[edit]- Special:New pages feed
- New pages sorted
- Stub Sort
- New Accounts
- Website Archive
- Cheatsheet
- Earwig's Copyvio tool
- Copypatrol copyvio tool
- Dabfix
- Dabsolver
- Dablink
- Dabs with missing entries
- Carbon dating the creation of web content (for checking for wiki mirrors)
- WorldCat
- Google Scholar profile
- WorldCat site
- Pending Changes
- G13 nominees
- Football Club History Database
Links for new editors
[edit]If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:
- General notability criteria
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- How to structure and layout your article
- On how to properly format your citations
de-orphaning is unlikely to be successful
[edit]Hi there, I appreciate your recent edits to an article I created. I just read the orphan article on Wikipedia and at the moment I highly doubt that de-orphaning will be successful at the moment. As an experienced editor what could you suggest for de-orphaning an article without linking to a Wikipedia live space article? And the page said that I could remove tag if de-orphaning would likely be unsuccessful but I'm just making sure if I won't get banned or blocked for removing a template.
Cheers! Thank you for your contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChadLawrence021 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Today, I de-orphaned article B major SA that was created August 10th. Tagged as orphan next day after created. My suggestion would be to allow 4 or 5 days before tagging. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 12:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Not sure what article you're referring to. However, it's good form to leave tags until the issue has been remedied. That way, other editors may see the tag and fix the issue. Onel5969 TT me 12:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Dear Editor:
Would you please look over this article when you get a chance? Thanks!
Joan Murray Joan arden murray (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. This really seems too closely paraphrased from this source. Please re-write in your own words. Onel5969 TT me 08:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Dear Editor:
I think I have done that now. Will you take another look? Thanks, Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]...for cleaning up my typos! Viriditas (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. Just trying to help where I can. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 TT me 13:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit
[edit]I appreciate it. Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- As always, a pleasure. Onel5969 TT me 13:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)