Jump to content

User talk:Shwcz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Shhhhwwww!!)
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

User talk:Shwcz/archive1

Blocked as requested

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/23prootie. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 14:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shwcz (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to have the User:23prootie account to be unbanned and this account to be unblocked. I have learned my lesson and I agree with the sanctions against me. I promise not to use any sockpuppets anymore and I promise to use this account as my primary account. I forgot the password from the User:23prootie account and I do not have access to the email. I would like to start fresh and use this account for useful edits. I promise not to start and edit war or to move pages without consensus, reasons why I was banned in the first place. I have refrained from editing in the last few months and I do not know if enough time have passed for my sanctions to be lifted. I apologize to the community for the disruption I have caused and I promise not to do it again. Shwcz (talk) 06:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shwcz → 23prootie

Status:     In progress

I request that a WP:Topic Ban on Philippines-related articles be instated for me in exchange of being able to edit again on unrelated articles.

Decline reason:

It’s clear there is no consensus for an unban at this time. Courcelles (talk) 18:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd be willing to transfer this discussion to WP:AN pending a checkuser being unable to find evidence of recent block evasion(checkuser, please ping me if that occurs). 331dot (talk) 09:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: No evidence of recent block evasion. I can certainly  Confirmed Shwcz to Seselas but I firmly believe that was already known. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm writing this to remind myself to transfer this discussion later(I am not presently in a position to). 331dot (talk) 15:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Transferred. 331dot (talk) 21:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sky Harbor, can you unblock the 23prootie and the Seselas accounts from the Tagalog Wikipedia. Shwcz (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@WayKurat, can you unblock the 23prootie, Seselas, and Shwcz accounts in the Tagalog Wikipedia. Shwcz (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sky Harbor & User:WayKurat, I promise not to vandalize, sockpuppet or do disruptive edits in the Tagalog Wikipedia. Shwcz (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unban/unblock request of Shwcz. Shwcz (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sky Harbor & WayKurat, maybe there should be a discussion in Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines about my UnBan/UnBlock for both the Tagalog and English Wikipedia since the Filipino community is the one most affected by my edits. Shwcz (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot & @Yamla can you CheckUser my sockpuppet accounts to see which has blocks/bans in other Wikipedias. Shwcz (talk) 00:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can't help you with blocks and bans on other Wikipedias. 331dot (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Shwcz, please raise the issue of your Tagalog Wikipedia block at WT:KAPE so this can be properly discussed. Keep in mind that the only bureaucrats on the Tagalog Wikipedia are myself, Jojit fb, Seav and Bluemask, so any discussion over any administrative action taken against you on the Tagalog Wikipedia will inevitably involve at least one of us. Thank you. --Sky Harbor (talk) 00:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sky Harbor, I don’t know if I can post as Shwcz in WT:KAPE because I am currently blocked. I am going to post using one of my sockpuppets Imeldific since I believe it is the only one not blocked there. Shwcz (talk) 01:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sky Harbor, I cannot make a request at WT:KAPE because even my IP address is blocked and my alternate accounts cannot post. Any discussion for a possible unblock must be discussed here. I would like to ask Jojit fb, Seav and Bluemask to participate in a discussion here because this is the only place where I could edit. Shwcz (talk) 01:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot & @Yamla, Can you add in the UnBan request at the Administrators' noticeboard that a WP:Topic Ban for Philippines-related articles will be instated for me in exchange of an UnBanning/UnBlocking. Shwcz (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've dropped the comment in Nosebagbear (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Cross-posting here as says lost password to [[User:23[pptie|23[pptie]]. WP:CBANned and will need a WP:checkuser. User is banned, not any one account. I see no point in unblocking it if user lost password. User needs to read WP:GAB. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shwcz (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Forgot password. No access to email. Shwcz (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you already have an open unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion

[edit]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Rizalito David has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Rizalito David until a consensus is reached. TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]