User talk:Reading Beans
Liverpool 1 move closure
[edit]This should have been relisted since there are only two people and both opposed it, one of which was a weak oppose. However, the nominator/proposer rationale should also been taken into account whether or not WP:SMALLDETAILS should be applied since there are only one article called Liverpool 1 (minus the dab page). JuniperChill (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @JuniperChill, your opinion as the nominator was opposed by two editors and none agreed with you. There was no need to relist the nomination as no other opinion aside from yours supported the nomination. It was——to me——a clear consensus to not move. Best, Reading Beans 09:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. I wouldn't say its clear since only 2 people (other than me) participated in the discussion and I don't think a 1-2 oppose is a reason to close the discussion. I think more input is necessary into determining whether or not WP:SMALLDETAILS should be used since a third participant might have supported it. I agree that some people use Liverpool 1 to refer to the shopping complex (Liverpool One) and that the logo has the number in it. However, natural disambiguation (which I forgot to mention) is preferred since the TV series almost always uses 1 while the shopping area, not as much. Plus one participant stated that the shopping area has almost the same views as the TV series. JuniperChill (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JuniperChill, it is not a 2-1 oppose, if we are going by headcount, it is a 2-0. I have no opinion whatsoever in the move request. I only evaluated the discussion and came to the conclusion that there is no consensus to move. I could be wrong and that would mean that (a) you could renom in few months (b) request for a move review to determine if my closure was correct. Best, Reading Beans 10:19, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:RMCOMMENT the nomination generally implies support so it was a 2-1 oppose not 2-0 but there didn't appear to be a consensus to move. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale, thank you for this, I was not aware of this policy. Yes, a consensus to move was not established. Best, Reading Beans 18:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:RMCOMMENT the nomination generally implies support so it was a 2-1 oppose not 2-0 but there didn't appear to be a consensus to move. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JuniperChill, it is not a 2-1 oppose, if we are going by headcount, it is a 2-0. I have no opinion whatsoever in the move request. I only evaluated the discussion and came to the conclusion that there is no consensus to move. I could be wrong and that would mean that (a) you could renom in few months (b) request for a move review to determine if my closure was correct. Best, Reading Beans 10:19, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. I wouldn't say its clear since only 2 people (other than me) participated in the discussion and I don't think a 1-2 oppose is a reason to close the discussion. I think more input is necessary into determining whether or not WP:SMALLDETAILS should be used since a third participant might have supported it. I agree that some people use Liverpool 1 to refer to the shopping complex (Liverpool One) and that the logo has the number in it. However, natural disambiguation (which I forgot to mention) is preferred since the TV series almost always uses 1 while the shopping area, not as much. Plus one participant stated that the shopping area has almost the same views as the TV series. JuniperChill (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Move review for Liverpool 1 (TV series)
[edit]An editor has asked for a Move review of Liverpool 1 (TV series). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. JuniperChill (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Move reviews are not a continuation of the move request, it is there to determine if the move was done properly. I have provided the direct link for you for easy access. Best, Reading Beans 22:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)