Talk:2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
|
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Requested move 15 June 2024
[edit]This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 23 June 2024. The result of the move review was Relist. |
It has been proposed in this section that 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel be renamed and moved to 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel – I believe that enough time has passed since the last RM (which proposed the simpler "7 October attacks" name and closed with consensus to retain the current title) to re-propose a title change for this article. I believe that "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel" is the WP:COMMONNAME for this event, as seen in sources such as:
- Al Jazeera: "... counter the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which saw ..."
- Bloomberg: "... trapped in Gaza since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which prompted ..."
- CBC: "... around the world since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel of Oct. 7 but are now ..."
- CNN: "... from the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel being held ..."
- Euracitiv: "... triggered by the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel in which ..."
- France24: "Before the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that triggered ..."
- ISW: "... spokesperson claimed that the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel was retaliation ..."
- Middle East Eye: "Following the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel and subsequent ..."
- NPR: "... Palestinian armed groups since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that set off the war ..."
- NYTimes: "... including some who participated in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, and that ..."
- Reuters: "... were involved in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that precipitated ..."
- Times of Israel: "... during and after the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel."
- The Conversation: "... participated in the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which resulted ... "
- WaPo: "Since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, restrictions have ..."
Many sources simply say "7 October" or "October 7 attacks" instead of spelling out the full name, but I believe that while "7 October attacks" could be a more COMMON name, I think that it fails WP:AT#Precision in favor of "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel." DecafPotato (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Despite all the requested move discussions for this article, this proposed name has a key aspect to it: Three-sided support. Both pro-Israeli sources (Times of Israel), pro-Palestine (pro-Hamas) sources (Al Jazeera) and English-based Western sources (all the rest up there) all call it "October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel". Even the non-news outlet Institute for the Study of War called it "October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel". So I have to say support on Common-Name reasoning. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 00:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support any phrasing with 7 October/October 7, which is a necessary part of the common name – 7 October attack would be sufficient. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. We'd need evidence that this is both WP:COMMONNAME currently, and that it will last beyond 7 October 2024. Additionally, we usually pay attention to consistency with other war-related articles, where [year] [event] (or [event] ([years]) is the dominant form. Finally, there has consistently been a consensus not to move.[1][2] — kashmīrī TALK 18:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- There's pretty solid evidence this is the common name. Britannica headlines it as The October 7, 2023, attack. In web searches for
hamas attack on israel
, the majority of recent sources prominently include the date, sometimes just to set the scene but more often as a descriptive common name. First page of results from this month (october 7
not included as search term):- an Oct. 7 cross-border attack (AP)
- Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack (AP)
- Hamas and other militants stormed into Israel on Oct. 7 (CBS)
- The brutal attack of 7 October by Hamas (UN)
- "another October 7" [quoting Biden] ... the October 7 attacks (Council on Foreign Relations)
- the 7 October attacks (International Institute for Strategic Studies)
- "since the immediate aftermath of October 7" ... the Hamas-led October 7 attacks (CNN)
- the attack by Hamas on 7 October (Sky)
- Yes, three of the above don't use October 7 as a name, instead putting it in prose, but others use the mere date metonymously. Speculating about future names seems less relevant than reflecting the sources we have now. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- There's pretty solid evidence this is the common name. Britannica headlines it as The October 7, 2023, attack. In web searches for
- I have a different suggestion: why not title the article just "October 7th attacks." It seems rather pointless to mention that Hamas carried out the attack. The 9/11 oage isn't title "September 11th Al-Qaeda attacks", after all. So, why should the standard on this page be any different? NesserWiki (talk) 11:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- attacks and *page
- NesserWiki (talk) 11:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support, virtually all the major RS use the date "October 7" when describing Hamas' attacks, it's pretty weird we are the only ones we don't. Galamore (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The quotes and sources provided above confirm what I thought was true for a long time: the words 'October 7' must appear in this article title. I can add to this list a recent report from Human Rights Watch which uses also use it "October 7 assault".[3]
- I'd also support a move to October 7 attacks, which is more concise so better in my opinion, but 'October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel' is okay too. HaOfa (talk) 07:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Same reasons as those already mentioned. The attack was not just for one day, and it is unclear whether it will receive the same status as September 11 in popular usage as time goes on. Also there has been repeated consensus not to move for this very reason, and nothing has changed since then. Lf8u2 (talk) 18:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support to October 7 Attacks only. Including "Hamas" in the title is already questionable as many sources point to it being a joint operation and one that has received meticulous planning by the wide range of resistance organizations in the Gaza Strip. "Israel" is unnecessary as there's only one attack widely known to have happened on October 7. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 18:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
*::: @Hameltion as a name it's just English: 7 October, Arabic: 7 أكتوبر (day first, read right to left) and October 7 in American. Other pages add "attack" because 7 October is in use for "on this day". MWQs (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Consistency doesn't really apply here in terms of [Year] [Event], because the COMMONNAME has emerged as [Date] [Event] instead, so the consistency would be with articles like September 11 attacks and January 6 United States Capitol attack. And the February and November RMs were five and eight months ago now, respectively, and the intermittent time has only reinforced 7 October as the Hamas attack's COMMONNAME. DecafPotato (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
*::@DecafPotato but none of those have a long description, by 8 October 2024 anyone adding that much detail will add a year. MWQs (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
*:@Kashmiri It is definitely the common name, but just 7 October, not the proposed title. I agree with you about consistency, we should do common name OR consistent description, not mix them, the proposed title is a bit of a mess that isn't common or consistent. We can't just call it 7 October but as @DecafPotato points out, adding just "attacks" to be 7 October attacks would be consistent with others. But I very strongly support 7 October not October 7, the others were in the USA, this wasn't, The month first thing is used more often in sources with POV problems (e.g. Eylon Levi), day first is common in a wider range of sources and is more readable to most of the world. MWQs (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the reasons stated above. Coretheapple (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
*oppose prpposed title but would support the title changing to "7 October attacks" by itself. The long description with a year-less date is weird, and not consistent with other pages. The common name is 7 October, nobody calls it the proposed title. MWQs (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Sock of banned editor
:: Also, putting all those elements in at once (7 October + Hamas + attack on Israel) sounds like the introduction to an Eylon Levy speech (he tended to pile in 3 different slogans before he got to a verb). To me "Hamas" sounds weird, because the attacks were the Qassam Brigades, Hamas is more the name for the political party, it's like saying Sinn Fein did a bombing spree instead of attributing that to the IRA. We can justify "7 October" OR "Hamas" being included as the common name in English, but both sounds like Eylon Levy. MWQs (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
:::@DecafPotato I just noticed you did find cases where people had written that combination of words, the Eylon effect is just the effect of saying it out loud. But I agree with @Kashmiri that "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel" won't be said in the 2030s, because by 8 October 2024 anybody adding that much detail will add the year. But there is a precedent for 7 October attacks by itself persisting as a common name, but not your proposal. MWQs (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer "7 October attacks" over the current title, for what it's worth. In the initial comment I conceded that it's likely a more common name than my proposed title but made an argument about WP:PRECISION in favor of including "Hamas-led" and "on Israel." But if editors disagree with that argument my position is very amendable to "7 October attacks." DecafPotato (talk) 18:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
::Also, I was have been considering suggesting a chang from "Hamas-led" to "Hamas-initiated" because some of it was planned but "go that way and do some violence" describes their leadership for about 2/3 of it. Changing it to just 7 October attacks solves the led vs initiated problem as well. MWQs (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kashmiri, this attempt to include the 7 October date has already failed a couple times in favor of formulations like the current title. This date is not meaningful to the average English speaking reader or if it is now, it will not be by this time next year.Selfstudier (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. "October 7" is the natural way to refer to the most recent October 7. If the yearless form lasts beyond its anniversary like "September 11" did, then it may be time to rename. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- I do believe that October 7 is the common name and that it is more recognizable than "2023". I reject the consistency argument and also reject that
This date is not meaningful to the average English speaking reader
. Especially when "Hamas-led attack on Israel" remains in the title, there should be no concern that readers won't know what we're talking about. However, I am not sure whether the move target should be 7 October or October 7. The local date format is, in fact, "7 October", but the English-language sources provided by the nom above show that reliable sources lean towards "October 7". Toadspike [Talk] 11:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC) - Oppose on conciseness and long-term significance grounds. "7 October" is noticeably longer than "2023", and the possibility of Hamas launching another attack on another October 7 cannot be ruled out as the Gaza war is a current event. NasssaNser 14:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- The second part of your comment is not only WP:CRYSTALBALL but also contradicts itself — how does the possibility that Hamas attacks Israel on the next October 7 mean that the title is too imprecise when Hamas attacked Israel many times over the course of 2023? DecafPotato (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support October 7 (or 7 October) is generally the most commonly used term by national and international newspapers, to the degree that it would even meet the requirements for a non-neutral title. But it’s not, and therefore the requirements are more than met. It’s also the way the term is colloquially used in political discussions and sometimes on wiki, which is a decent indication that it will remain the commonly used term at least in the near future. While we can’t know the actual future (and therefore any arguments that there might be a different name in the future hold limited weight), one could also argue that events commemorating this attack will likely use the same language that is utilised by Israel and other western countries, which is generally Oct. 7.
- FortunateSons (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support The vast majority of international media refers to the attack as the 7th October attack (or some variation of the date), therefore, it would appear that this is the WP:CommonName. A lot of weight is given to the date (7th October) when referring to the attack. I don't think I've ever seen anyone described the attack as the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel; the current title is certainly not the WP:CommonName. IJA (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support but prefer October 7 attack on Israel or simply October 7 attack for brevity. Not sure why the title was changed back. October 7 attack seems the common name to me and seems uncontroversial and entirely free of POV concerns. My only concern would be what further specification is needed to differentiate it from other events internationally, and I think "on Israel" suffices. Unbandito (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Original close, overturned to "relist" at move review
|
---|
The result of the move request was: Moved to 7 October attacks. There was clear consensus to move away from the current title as the date was found to be an important part of the WP:COMMONNAME. The arguments opposing the move largely relied on the idea of another attack on 7 October 2024 which was demmed WP:CRYSTALBALL by the discussion. No prejudice against another discussion between the original proposoed title and 7 October attacks. (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 14:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
|
- Relisting coment - the original close has been reversed with the discussion relisted, following the move review at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 June, and the article moved back to the previous stable title. — Amakuru (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: can you make it so there is a notice at the top of the page? And since this is a recurring problem, would be good if someone found a technical solution to when RM are re-opened.VR (Please ping on reply) 16:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I've manually reinsert the template on the article. I don't really know why the bot didn't do this, given that it did put it back in the RM discussions board. @Wbm1058: any ideas? Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 17:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: can you make it so there is a notice at the top of the page? And since this is a recurring problem, would be good if someone found a technical solution to when RM are re-opened.VR (Please ping on reply) 16:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose any title that doesn't have 2023 in it. The problem with news media is they operate on a much smaller time scale than wikipedia. In the first week of the attack, they reported it "Saturday's" attacks[4][5][6]. The next week they reported it as "last week's" attack[7][8][9].By November it had become "last month"'s attacks[10][11] or "October's attack"[12][13] So it is natural now for them to call it "October 7" attacks even though this may change yet again. We need to consider Wikipedia:Long-term significance of the name before we use it.
It is worth noting that "October 7" is also the date of a Hezbollah attack on Israel and the start of the United States invasion of Afghanistan.VR (Please ping on reply) 17:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)- @Vice regent: When you bring up that October 7 is also the date of other attacks, you must also demonstrate that those attacks have been referred to in reliable sources as "the October 7 attack" to refute the WP:COMMONNAME argument. Simply saying that other events could be known as the same name (when they aren't) is not sufficient. DecafPotato (talk) 18:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- In order to not distract from my main argument, I've struck out that part.VR (Please ping on reply) 02:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 7 October attacks or any title that is less WP:RECOGNIZABLE than the current one. It is a very significant event by all means, but it can also be seen as an escalation in a regional conflict that has lasted more than 100 years. In comparison the September 11 attacks were a pivotal moment in world history that make that title instantly recognizable. The same cannot be said about the term "7 October attacks" or similar, even though the event is much more recent. Vpab15 (talk) 22:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
* Oppose - We need a name, not an abstract, 7 October attacks was possibly a bit too non-specific, but 7 October attacks on Israel of 7 October 2023 attacks would be enough to disambigute it. There are other attacks on Israel that happened on the 7 October in other years, but they're not known by date? So it's not genuinely ambiguous. The only case that comes close is the October War, but that started with an attack on 6 October. MWQs (talk) 05:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
:: Also, incitement is not leadership, so "Hamas-led" is not very accurate (nb - this as a criticism of them, not an excuse), but the date and the target are indisputable. MWQs (talk) 05:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose to any name change: opposing 7 October Hamas-led attack as misleading since the attack lasted for 2 days after at least as well; and opposing just 7 October attacks as this is not used in majority of RS. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- But it is used by the majority of sources... HaOfa (talk) 07:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Where is your evidence for this? I'm yet to see evidence for this claim. IJA (talk) 04:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- But it is used by the majority of sources... HaOfa (talk) 07:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - On reflection, I now oppose this move, having previously offered my support for same. This is because there have been several attacks in the region on the 7th October (2000 Hezbollah cross-border raid and 2004 Sinai bombings) and referring to it as simply the 7 October Attack could lead to confusion. I'm not entirely convinced that "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel" is the common name for this attack and I'm yet to see sufficient evidence stating that it is. Additionally, the attack lasted two days, not one day, therefore calling it the 7 October Attack is strange when it was still happening on the 8th October. I think the current title name is perfectly fine as it is. IJA (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support at this point it is very safe to say that the term "October 7" is used universally when describing the Hamas attack, not only in Israel but as people have shown here also in the world's leading media channels. I think the title should reflect this fact. Other attacks also happened in the same date, but only in this case, the date is the most common name of the event. PeleYoetz (talk) 16:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Let's go with the status quo, since there were no other attacks during 2023 initiated by Hamas; the one started in October 2023 constitutes an episode in the still -as of 2024- ongoing conflict. There is simply no additional information imparted by changing the title to what is proposed. Per WP:NC. -The Gnome (talk) 12:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support, better fit for WP:CRITERIA because it's more precise and recognizable. I'd also support just "October 7 attack" or "7 October attack" or any such variation as more concise; I think the date is the WP:COMMONNAME for the event (with or without the year). In addition to the media sources posted above (e.g. by DecafPotato and Hameltion, and I'm sure we could find more), here are some academic sources:
- Journals: Journal of Genocide Research [14], Studies in Conflict & Terrorism [15], Insight Turkey [16], Contemporary Jewry [17]; Canadian Journal of Cardiology [18], Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy [19], Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology [20]; Israel Studies [21] [22]; Shofar (journal) [23] [24] [25]; Israel Medical Association Journal [26]
- Books: [27] [28] [29] [30]
- Magazines: Quadrant (magazine) [31], Commentary (magazine) [32], analyse & kritik [33], Dissent (American magazine) [34]
- With the year (as part of a full date in the title): The Lancet (eClinicalMedicine) [35], Psychiatry Research [36], Journal of Traumatic Stress [37], Prehospital and Disaster Medicine [38], Journal of Affective Disorders [39], Culture, Agriculture, Food & Environment [40], Conflict and Health [41], American Journal of Disaster Medicine [42], Journal of Museum Education [43]; Book chapter: [44] Levivich (talk) 01:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Levivich agree with you on having "October 7" in the title. But given the sources that you present that have the year in them, shouldn't you oppose removing the year from the title? Likewise, some of the sources you present actually include "Hamas" in the title ([45]) or "Gaza" ([46]) or "Israel" ([47]). Some of the publications are Israel-focused (Israel Studies) where the meaning is obvious. The fact that some of the sources you cite refer to the event as only "October 7" ([48]) – a title we must absolutely reject – should indicate that the lack of qualifiers in a source does not imply we must similarly discard them.VR (Please ping on reply) 04:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @VR: 18 sources I posted don't have the year in the titles, 10 do (unless I miscounted). I wouldn't oppose a title that had the year in it ("October 7, 2023 attack") but I think we can omit the year as an unnecessary disambiguator, in the name of WP:CONCISE. While the sources use the words "October 7" in a variety of different forms ("October 7 attacks," "10/7," "7 October massacre", etc. etc.), I think when we apply WP:AT to this set of slightly different titles, some variation of "October 7 attacks" is the one that fits WP:AT criteria best. It includes a necessary disambiguator (e.g. "attacks") but omits unnecessary ones (e.g. "2023," "Israel," "Hamas," "Gaza," all of which are used by some sources but none of which are so predominant so as to become part of the common name). It's precise enough, as evidenced by the sources using the same level of precision (month and day) and as concise as possible (can't drop the third word) while still being recognizable (as evidenced by its usage in many sources), natural ("[date] attack"), and consistent (at least with September 11 attacks). Levivich (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support a title with "October 7" and no year, per Hameltion and Levivich's common name analysis, with preference to "October 7 attack" (no additional qualifiers). Very clearly the common name. Used by sources no matter where you look. The Britannica article, a tertiary source like Wikipedia, uses just "October 7 attack", for instance. C F A 💬 04:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 June 2024
[edit]This edit request to 7 October attacks has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Have a look at the first sentence in the "Events leading to the attack" section:
Over the course of 2023, before the attack, increased settler attacks had displaced hundreds of Palestinians, and there were clashes around the Al-Aqsa Mosque, a contested holy site in Jerusalem.[1]
1. Displaced whom exactly? Is there a citation for this?
2. "Settler attacks"? Are we going to completely ignore the numerous attacks by Palestinians throughout 2023? Just to name a few:
- May 12th - Hundreds of rockets launched towards Israel.
https://apnews.com/article/israel-gaza-palestinians-strikes-jihad-0d9d56b5c4fc2e8999105b05c8d30a2f
- January 27th - Palestinian gunman killed 7, including 70 year old woman.
- February 10th - Palestinian driver killed 2 Israelis (including a 6-year-old boy) and injured 5 others.
- April 7th - shooting attack in Tel Aviv, Italian tourist killed, several others wounded.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-april-7-2023/
- June 20th - Palestinians opened fire on a group of Israelis, killing 4 and injuring 4 others.
- August 1st - Palestinian shot and wounded 6 Israelis.
- August 5th - Palestinian killed an Israeli.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/05/world/middleeast/palestinian-shooting-israel-tel-aviv.html
- August 19th - Palestinian killed 2 Israelis.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/19/two-israelis-killed-by-suspected-palestinian-gunman 3. Maybe explain why there were clashes near Temple Mount?
Here is my proposal:
In the months leading up to the attack, Palestinian violence against Israelis escalated significantly, including hundreds of rockets fired from Gaza towards Israeli cities, as well as numerous shooting and car-ramming attacks that resulted in multiple Israeli fatalities.
Citations:
- https://apnews.com/article/israel-gaza-palestinians-strikes-jihad-0d9d56b5c4fc2e8999105b05c8d30a2f
- https://apnews.com/article/politics-israel-government-palestinian-territories-benjamin-netanyahu-fb2251b5b6c8ef73a21f87620d20090c
- https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-06-20/ty-article/at-least-1-israeli-wounded-in-suspected-west-bank-shooting/00000188-d8fb-d5fc-ab9d-dbfb7e9e0000
2A0D:6FC2:4000:400:97EC:26:BBEC:F991 (talk) 12:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Have you read WP:SYNTH? A reliable source that directly supports the proposed wording is required. Do any of your sources do that? In other words, we can't conclude, based on individual samples, that a pattern or trend exists and write things like "In the months leading up to the attack..." etc. A reliable source has to do that. Then we can cite it. We are not reliable sources. Sean.hoyland (talk) 12:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- 1. I agree with you. Can we conclude, based on 0 samples or citations, that "Over the course of 2023, before the attack, increased settler attacks had displaced hundreds of Palestinians"?
- 2. If we're going to include the Temple Mount clashes, and we want a complete background, then we should also include the "numerous shooting and car-ramming attacks that resulted in multiple Israeli fatalities" that my sources support, as well as the May 2023 war launched by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. 2A0D:6FC2:4000:400:97EC:26:BBEC:F991 (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- The current text is supported by the AP article. You'll need to find a source that discussed the attacks by Palestinians in 2023 prior to the start of the war. Alaexis¿question? 17:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done: the proposed changes would need consensus, but since the IP is not extended confirmed, then that's not something that they can establish or even discuss (per WP:ARBECR). M.Bitton (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Result
[edit]We cannot have the result say 'inconclusive or Hamas victory'; that is in direct violation of the rules regarding a military info-box. I’m not even trying to be political, but it does not make sense to say, 'well, you see, Hamas either won or didn’t win, we don’t know.' I keep saying this: an info-box can only say X Victory, Y Victory, or inconclusive. LuxembourgLover (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think such instructions in infobox docs can be ignored when there's a good reason, but in this case I'd support just removing the field, since the result is a matter of perspective and we can't fit any meaningful assessment in a few words. — xDanielx T/C\R 18:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think we need a new infobox - "Infobox mass atrocity". I don't really like the binary choice between "civilian attack" and "military conflict", as they don't capture the spectrum of incidents (for instance, the term "civilian" can be ambiguous – in a huge number of contexts we'd prefer combatant vs non-combatant). — kashmīrī TALK 19:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Update, the new resulte is no better. LuxembourgLover (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hamas' own words
[edit]Is there room on this article for the actual Hamas statement on the attack - https://twitter.com/pmofa/status/1710630801379922370 - or do we continue with the established tradition of ignoring Palestinian voices? Specifically the sentence: "Hamas said its attack was in response to the continued Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, the blockade of the Gaza Strip, the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements, rising Israeli settler violence, and recent escalations." This should, at the very least, have a link to their own Press Release. Mcdruid (talk) 08:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
the war crimes and atrocities section should be updated following 2 reports from HRW
[edit]https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/07/17/october-7-crimes-against-humanity-war-crimes-hamas-led-groups https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/07/17/i-cant-erase-all-blood-my-mind/palestinian-armed-groups-october-7-assault-israel Monochromemelo1 (talk) 23:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- ^ "Israel declares war, goes after Hamas fighters and bombards Gaza". Associated Press. 7 October 2023. Archived from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 7 October 2023.
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- High-importance Crime-related articles
- C-Class Serial killer-related articles
- High-importance Serial killer-related articles
- Serial Killer task force
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Israel-related articles
- High-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Mid-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- B-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- High-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Closed move reviews
- Requested moves