Jump to content

Talk:Neo-paganism in the Republic of Ireland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 March 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 16:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Neo-paganism in the Republic of IrelandModern paganism in the Republic of Ireland – Consistency with main page Modern paganism and other spread pages like Modern paganism in the United Kingdom and Modern paganism in Scandinavia Ingwina (talk) 07:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 08:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Religion has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Ireland has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Neopaganism has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article

[edit]

@Alison. The article is currently full of OR and unsourced promotional info. Keeping it as is simply isn't an option. That said, if you think it merits a separate article and have time/sources to flesh it out, that would be an acceptable solution. If not I think blank-and-redirect is a good way to preserve the article's existence (and record of history) while not continuing to host un-encyclopedic content in contradiction with our policies. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 23:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add that this article has been tagged as lack of sources since 2017 so I feel its reasonable to say that just leaving it and hoping it improves isn't working. A blank-and-redirect allows for any searchers to be sent to the main article, and if the Neopagan section gets developed enough it can be spun out into a separate article here. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Final comment, sorry. @Dbachmann did exactly what I did way back in 2010, where it remained as a redirect until an IP reverted it in 2017. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's now significantly improved, with somewhat decent references. More tomorrow and over the weekend after I hit the books - Alison talk 05:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Excellent editing, this is much stronger now. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 23:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]