Talk:Burson (company)/Archives/2019
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Request for Comment - Merger
Last year, Burson-Marsteller merged with Cohn & Wolfe to create (BCW) Burson Cohn & Wolfe. Should there be a new article on the new entity, BCW, if Wikipedia:Notability can be established, or should Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe be merged somehow? As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. I plan to request some article improvements, but figured some community feedback here first would be helpful. BCW Editor (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Called by bot. The two articles should be merged, and current content from both articles should be included in the new article. Perhaps much of the current content may go into the history section. Darx9url (talk) 03:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Merge – Also called here by a bot. Cohn & Wolfe can easily be merged into this page and does not appear highly notable. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 04:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Noting that User:GenQuest has completed this. Klbrain (talk) 21:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Merger complete.
BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe)
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Last year, Burson-Marsteller merged [2][3] with Cohn & Wolfe to create (BCW) Burson Cohn & Wolfe. Per Wikipedia's standards, what is the best way to handle this? Should there be a new article on the new entity, BCW, if Wikipedia:Notability can be established? Or is it better to merge Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe? As an employee of BCW, I will follow the guidelines set for editors with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. I created an account to suggest updates to BCW articles on Wikipedia. Before I begin suggesting specific updates, I want to get a feel for how Wikipedia editors think the merger should be addressed. I look forward to collaborating! Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping. BCW Editor (talk) 18:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Infobox
Company type | Subsidiary |
---|---|
Industry | |
Predecessor |
|
Founded | 2018[1] |
Headquarters | 200 Fifth Avenue, New York City, United States |
Area served | Worldwide |
Key people |
|
Brands |
|
Number of employees | 4,000 (2018[2]) |
Parent | WPP plc[1] |
Website | www.bcw-global.com |
Now that the Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe pages are merged and moved to "Burson Cohn & Wolfe", I drafted an infobox for the combined company. As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance here. You'll note that the article's current infobox is specific to Burson-Marsteller, one of BCW's predecessor firms. My draft infobox focuses solely on the merged firm. Also, BCW has a new logo, which I uploaded to Wikipedia and included my draft. If a Burson-Marsteller infobox is still necessary, perhaps it could be relocated to the Burson-Marsteller history section. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 20:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ a b Bradley, Diana (27 February 2018). "WPP Merges Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe". PR Week. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
- ^ a b c Shah, Aarti (February 27, 2018). "WPP Creates 3rd Largest PR Firm With Burson Cohn & Wolfe". The Holmes Report. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
- ^ Moore, Thomas (May 17, 2018). "BCW Group merges two tech firms into AxiCom US". PR Week. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
- ^ Rittenhouse, Lindsay (August 14, 2018). "WPP's Burson Cohn & Wolfe Acquires Creative Shop HZ". Adweek. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
- ^ "Burson-Marsteller - an optimistic view". PR Week. May 1, 2017. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
- User:GenQuest, can you consider adding my draft infobox and BCW's new logo for the combined company? As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance here. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- User:Darx9url, User:Coffeeandcrumbs, and User:Klbrain: Since you commented on the merge previously, would you consider this request to update the infobox following the merge? The live infobox pertains to Burson-Marsteller, not the combined agency BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe), for which this article is named. Also, I have asked the editor who deleted the new logo because it was unused if they could assist in restoring the image and placing it in the infobox. User:GenQuest merged the articles in May and has not had time to assist with this infobox request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Partly done: BCW Editor, I have uploaded the logo to File:Burson Cohn & Wolfe.png. I have also made modified changes to the infobox according to standard practice, guidelines and policies I am familiar with. You can ping me for further changes. I skipped the brands because it seemed promotional to list non-notable brands. The overuse of "global" also seemed promotional as well. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 19:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Coffeeandcrumbs: Thanks! The infobox looks much better now. I did have one comment. BCW was founded in 2018. While I understand why you kept 1953 as the oldest founding date, this is the founding date for Burson-Marsteller rather than BCW itself, and I wonder if it is confusing. Can you consider changing that to 2018? Or perhaps updating to something similar to what's done at the PricewaterhouseCoopers article? Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- BCW Editor, I have done something similar. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Coffeeandcrumbs: That looks really good. Thanks for the speedy updates! BCW Editor (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- BCW Editor, I have done something similar. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Coffeeandcrumbs: Thanks! The infobox looks much better now. I did have one comment. BCW was founded in 2018. While I understand why you kept 1953 as the oldest founding date, this is the founding date for Burson-Marsteller rather than BCW itself, and I wonder if it is confusing. Can you consider changing that to 2018? Or perhaps updating to something similar to what's done at the PricewaterhouseCoopers article? Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Darx9url, User:Coffeeandcrumbs, and User:Klbrain: Since you commented on the merge previously, would you consider this request to update the infobox following the merge? The live infobox pertains to Burson-Marsteller, not the combined agency BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe), for which this article is named. Also, I have asked the editor who deleted the new logo because it was unused if they could assist in restoring the image and placing it in the infobox. User:GenQuest merged the articles in May and has not had time to assist with this infobox request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Request to Restructure Article
Hi, everyone! I have a request for editors to consider. Following the 2018 merger of Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe to form BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe), the pages for the two predecessor companies were themselves merged. However, the structure of the current article for BCW is a bit confusing in some places, as much of the work done by the predecessor companies, specifically Burson-Marsteller, is now attributed to BCW.
For instance, the introduction is correct, but then the "Services" section lists work previously done by Burson-Marsteller.
Then, the "History" sections for Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe are correct.
However, everything in the "Operations" section forward is attributed to Burson Cohn & Wolfe when in fact that is all historical Burson-Marsteller information.
There is a potentially simple fix for this I would like to ask editors to consider. As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance here instead of editing the article myself.
I recommend reorganizing the existing content from the article to create two new sections, "Burson-Marsteller" and "Cohn & Wolfe", which could look like this:
- Burson-Marsteller
- Company history
- Services
- Training
- Crisis management
- Tylenol
- Bhopal
- Other cases
- Corporate PR
- Technology
- Public affairs
- Romania
- Indonesia
- Argentina
- Ukraine
- Turkey
- Healthcare
- Google smear campaign
- Brand marketing
- Cohn & Wolfe
- Company history and historical operations
This is just an idea - I'm open to other suggestions.
On a related note, I am also working on a new "History" section which explains the creation of Burson Cohn & Wolfe, and an "Operations" section to outline BCW's current operations.
What do editors think? Is it possible to reorganize the existing content from "History", "Services", and "Operations" into new sections called "Burson-Marsteller" and "Cohn & Wolfe"? After some restructuring, we could also change the name "Burson Cohn & Wolfe" to the names of its predecessor companies where appropriate for proper historical context. I really appreciate you considering this request. There is a lot of great information in the article, but I want to help ensure that it is as clear as possible for readers. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Coffeeandcrumbs: Would you also consider this request to update the article following the merge of the Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe articles? Thanks for all your help so far! BCW Editor (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Darx9url: Following up on your comment from the above Request for Comment. Here I have suggested a way to clarify much of this article's historical content. Can you please review this request to create two new sections with existing content, "Burson-Marsteller" and "Cohn & Wolfe"? The article will still need more work, but this is a start. As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance.BCW Editor (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- BCW Editor I think your proposed changes are all fine and would be improvements to the article. Please go ahead and make the changes. Having a conflict of interest doesn't mean that you can't edit the article. You still can (with care), you just have to declare your conflict of interest (which you have already done). Darx9url (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- User:Darx9url: Thank you for the review. Would you be able to make the edits and attribute them to this request? I'm hesitant to make the changes myself since it’s recommended in the conflict of interest guide not to edit pages at all where there’s a financial conflict. If there's anything I can do to help others make these updates, I'm happy to do so! BCW Editor (talk) 22:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- User:GenQuest and User:Coffeeandcrumbs: Would either of you be able to review my proposed changes to restructure this article post-merger? User:Darx9url said the changes would be improvements and encouraged me to make them myself. However, I'm hesitant to edit the article directly since I have a financial Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If you cannot (because I know you are volunteering and have other interests on Wikipedia!), maybe you could recommend another venue with editors interested in this sort of task? Thanks to everyone for all your help so far! BCW Editor (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- @BCW Editor: I think I can spare some time this weekend and will see what I can do with it. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 10:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- User:GenQuest and User:Coffeeandcrumbs: Would either of you be able to review my proposed changes to restructure this article post-merger? User:Darx9url said the changes would be improvements and encouraged me to make them myself. However, I'm hesitant to edit the article directly since I have a financial Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If you cannot (because I know you are volunteering and have other interests on Wikipedia!), maybe you could recommend another venue with editors interested in this sort of task? Thanks to everyone for all your help so far! BCW Editor (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Potential restructuring
I know this is a big request, and I appreciate everyone's time and feedback so far. I do think restructuring this article will help readers understand the company and the history of Burson-Martsteller and Cohn & Wolfe post-merger. User:Darx9url and User:GenQuest: To make my request a little more concrete, here's a draft to show what I had in mind in terms of restructuring, while also updating the tense and some details. If this looks appropriate, would one of you mind making the changes? If it's a lot to bite off, I would be open to making the changes so long as neither of you have any objections and you both have had a chance to review. Ideally, I want to keep my contributions to Talk pages because of my conflict of interest, but I also know this is a big request. Darx9url previously said the "proposed changes are all fine and would be improvements to the article. Please go ahead and make the changes". I want to be cautious, though, given my conflict.
Below is a draft of my proposed "Burson-Marsteller" and "Cohn & Wolfe" sections made up of the live article's existing material, with minor tweaks. This draft is highlighted: The green content shows proposed updates and additions; red content is proposed for deletion. (If editors approve of this approach, I have pasted a clean copy of the draft without highlights in my userspace.)
Reviewing editors will see my draft puts material specifically about Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe in the past tense, deletes obviously outdated or unnecessary details, basic copy editing, and removes two unnecessary "citation needed" tags.
Changes highlighted
|
---|
Burson-MarstellerHistoryPrior to its merger with Cohn & Wolfe, Burson-Marsteller comprised 77 offices and 85 affiliate offices, operating in 110 countries across six continents [1] The company was founded by Harold Burson and William Marsteller in 1953, and, by the early 1980s, had become one of the largest public relations companies in the world. In 1979 it became a subsidiary of Young & Rubicam, which in turn was later acquired by WPP Group PLC.[2] In 2018, it merged with Cohn & Wolfe and renamed Burson Cohn & Wolfe.[3]
Prior to the establishment of Burson-Marsteller, co-founders Harold Burson and William "Bill" Marsteller owned separate agencies, focused on public relations and advertising, respectively. Burson had established Harold Burson Public Relations in 1946 and was based in New York City. Meanwhile, Marsteller had founded the Chicago-based advertising agency Marsteller Gebhardt and Reed (later renamed Marsteller Inc.) in 1951.[6] Burson and Marsteller met in 1952 when Marsteller needed a PR agency to work on an account for his client, Rockwell Manufacturing,[7] and was referred to Burson. The two agencies shared the Rockwell account and, later, an account for Clark Engineering Equipment Company.[8] In 1953, they entered into partnership,[9] creating a new public relations firm that was owned jointly by Burson and by Marsteller's advertising agency.[10] Beginning with a staff of four and just two main clients,[11] operations quickly grew, and in the early 1960s Burson-Marsteller began to establish a presence outside of the United States. In 1960, they opened an office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, becoming the first U.S. PR agency to do so.[12] One year later, in 1961 following the founding of the Common Market in Europe, the company established its first European office in Geneva, shortly followed by an office in Brussels in 1965.[13] At this time Hill & Knowlton was the only other U.S. PR firm with an office outside the United States.[2] In 1967, Burson-Marsteller opened its first London office.[13]
One of the firm's earliest clients was the Electro-Motive Division of General Motors (GM), the division of GM that made diesel locomotives, beginning in 1956, and was the only PR agency retained by GM at the time.[14] In 1970, Burson-Marsteller was engaged by the main division of GM to manage its PR,[7] following stiff competition from larger firms. According to Harold Burson, GM was seeking outside PR management following the publication of Ralph Nader's book Unsafe At Any Speed, which called into question GM's design practices, and led to negative media representation of the company. GM remained a client of Burson-Marsteller for the next eleven years.[15] At the time they took on GM, Burson-Marsteller was the 10th largest PR firm in the United States.[16] In 1974, Wolcott and Company, a Los Angeles-based public relations firm founded by Robert "Bob" B. Wolcott Jr., merged with Burson-Marsteller. Wolcott Co. had offices in New York, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco. Bob Wolcott joined the executive management team and was in charge of West Coast and Asian operations.[17]
In 1979, the company was sold to the communications group Young & Rubicam. In his memoirs, Burson described the decision as being made for two primary reasons. First, Burson-Marsteller required capital in order to finance its expansion. Second, Marsteller's advertising agency had declined in profitability and "needed management fixing".[2] Following the takeover, Burson became executive vice-president and a board member of Young & Rubicam.[6][18] As part of Young & Rubicam in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Burson-Marsteller became known for its crisis management work.[19] Notable clients consulting Burson-Marsteller for crisis management included: Babcock & Wilcox, following the Three Mile Island accident in 1979; Johnson & Johnson, during the 1982 Tylenol crisis;[20] and Union Carbide Corporation following 1984 Bhopal disaster.[21][22] The company was also involved in the introduction of New Coke in early 1985. In interviews Burson has stated that the negative reaction of the public to the new product was unexpected.[22] Following the reintroduction of the original Coke recipe, the strategy that Burson-Marsteller advised Coca-Cola to employ was to "be humble" and apologize to the U.S. public for making the decision to change to New Coke.[16][20] Just two months after original Coke was reintroduced as Classic Coke, sales of Coke, Coca-Cola Classic and Cherry Coke had risen 10 percent compared with the previous year.[23] The 1980s also saw the company involved in large-scale publicity events. In 1984, Burson-Marsteller first brought entertainment and sports together to generate publicity for its clients with the organization of the AT&T Olympic Torch Relay, sponsored by the telecommunications company.[24] This was the largest promotional event that the company had undertaken to date, with up to 150 people working full-time on organizing the 8,000-mile relay.[25] One year later, Burson-Marsteller executive Geoff Nightingale came up with the idea of Hands Across America as a fundraising event for USA for Africa sponsored by its client Coca-Cola.[26] By 1983, Burson-Marsteller had become the world's largest PR firm, with $63.8 million in revenue for that year.[7] The following year it acquired Cohn & Wolfe, an Atlanta-based public relations firm,[27] which operated as a subsidiary of Burson-Marsteller until 2000. Burson-Marsteller Burson-Marsteller also expanded into Central and South America during the 1980s. Offices were established in San Juan, Puerto Rico and Sao Paulo. A regional headquarters was established in Miami in May 1989,[32] and with the regional headquarters in place, the company won MasterCard International's Latin American account, which became one of the firm's largest accounts of the time.[33] The agency's business grew by about 24% annually during the 1980s, according to Burson, and PR Week stated in 1988 that Burson-Marsteller was by that point "the largest international PR firm in the world".[9] The following year, Burson stepped down as CEO of the firm. He continued to work on major accounts such as Coca-Cola and Merrill Lynch,[22] while James H. Dowling succeeded him as the second ever CEO of Burson-Marsteller.[34]
By 1990 Burson-Marsteller had branches in 28 countries, with 52 offices and over 2,300 employees.[18] Notable international work carried out by Burson-Marsteller in the early 1990s included a public relations campaign undertaken for the Egyptian Ministry of Tourism in 1993, following terrorist attacks on tourists in Egypt. The campaign aimed to encourage tourists to visit Egypt, focusing on recent archaeological discoveries.[35] In December 1994, the company received attention after an executive at Burson-Marsteller was killed by a mailbomb sent by the "Unabomber". The Washington Post reported that Ted Kaczynski targeted Burson-Marsteller executive Thomas Mosser due to a belief Exxon had consulted with Burson-Marsteller during the Valdez oil spill. Burson-Marsteller stated that they had advised Exxon in the past and had been asked to review and analyze Exxon's handling of the disaster afterwards, but had not been engaged to manage the crisis itself.[36] In the 1990s the company also received considerable attention for PR campaigns on behalf of tobacco company Altria (formerly Philip Morris Companies Inc.) in which it was engaged to discredit anti-smoking research and legislation attempts.[37] In 1993 Burson-Marsteller helped organize a response to a 1992 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report which had identified secondhand smoke as a Group A human carcinogen.[38] The strategy employed by Burson-Marsteller was to build doubt among consumers about the scientific validity of the EPA report and to target legislators who supported curbs on smoking.[39] As part of this strategy, the company organized a smokers' rights group called the National Smokers Alliance (NSA),[40] to target politicians who supported anti-smoking legislation.[41][42] The NSA was founded with an estimated $4 million in Philip Morris seed money and involvement of some fifty other tobacco industry players.[43] Their activities also included support for The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC), which was created in 1993 by APCO Worldwide, another major public relations firm, with funding from Philip Morris.[44][45] In Europe, Burson-Marsteller provided support for an advertising campaign in 1996 carried out by Philip Morris. Advertisements were published comparing the health risks of secondhand smoke exposure with a range of other activities. This campaign received significant coverage in the media across Europe.[46] Burson-Marsteller was criticized in the media for its involvement with Philip Morris, and in 1999 a demonstration was held outside of the firm's headquarters, protesting their role as PR for Philip Morris.[47] Those involved went to great lengths not to reveal the tobacco industry support of these organizations, in order to give the appearance they represented grassroots opposition to anti-smoking laws rather than the business interests of their sponsors.[48][49] At the end of the 1990s, the firm had retained its position as the largest PR agency in the world, with fees of over $274 million for that year.[22] As part of the company's continued growth, it acquired grassroots lobbying organization Direct Impact in April 1999.[50][51] In the same year, Harold Burson was named by PR Week as the PR industry's "most influential person of the 20th century".[7][22]
Young & Rubicam became a subsidiary of the media group WPP Group PLC in 2000, and Burson-Marsteller became part of WPP.[7] In December 2005, Burson-Marsteller acquired the Indian firm Genesis PR as a wholly owned subsidiary. Following this acquisition India and China became Burson-Marsteller's second and third largest markets worldwide, based on number of employees.[55] The renamed Genesis Burson-Marsteller was announced as the company's hub for the South Asian market in 2008.[56] Prior to the acquisition, since 2002, Genesis had been Burson-Marsteller's exclusive representative in India.[57] Mark Penn became the CEO of Burson-Marsteller in December 2005,[58] following a period of instability at the firm during which there were three leadership changes in one year.[59] Penn's predecessor, Tom Nides, had left Burson-Marsteller after eight months in the role.[60] A White House political pollster for six years, he was best known for his work with President Bill Clinton, Tony Blair and Bill Gates.[61] Penn (who had not previously worked within PR) introduced new strategies at Burson-Marsteller, including one called "DIGS" (digital, integrated, global, strategic)[62] and "Evidence-Based Communications",[62] described by the company as a scientific and data-driven approach to communications,[63] which drew from Penn's background in research.[59] Penn and Burson-Marsteller received negative media attention in 2008 when his work on behalf of the Colombian government (then seeking a free-trade agreement with the United States) became a political liability for the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, who was opposed to a free-trade pact with Colombia. Penn described the dual role an "error in judgment" following which the Colombian government terminated its client relationship.[64][65] Clinton later revised her opinion in favor of the free-trade pact.[66][67] Penn’s leadership at Burson-Marsteller has been cited by PR Week as a model for the public relations industry, particularly combining public affairs experience with public relations.[68][69][70] In April 2011, industry expert Paul Holmes named Burson-Marsteller the U.S. Large Agency of the Year, citing its double-digit growth within the United States and record 2010 profits as factors in the award, crediting Penn with improved performance and Burson’s "global recovery".[59] Notable clients for Burson-Marsteller in the late 2000s (decade) include Ford Motor Company, which took on the company as crisis management consultants in 2009,[71] and American International Group (AIG), on whose behalf the firm undertook crisis management work in 2008 and 2009. Burson-Marsteller was brought in by AIG to help respond to requests for information from customers, employees and the media, due to the liquidity crisis it suffered in September 2008.[72] In 2010, Burson-Marsteller announced it had made a commitment to no longer accept work on behalf of the tobacco industry.[73] In May 2011, Burson-Marsteller was hired by Facebook to conduct a PR attack on Google.[74][75] Burson-Marsteller contacted a number of media companies and bloggers in an effort to get them to write unflattering stories about Google.The campaign backfired when one of the bloggers went public by posting the emails he received from Burson-Marsteller on the Internet.[76] Don Baer, former communications director for the Clinton administration, was named CEO of Burson-Marsteller in 2012.[77] He served in that capacity through February 2018, when WPP Services
TrainingWithin the industry Burson-Marsteller was known for its effective company employee training programs[82] and for having helped to develop the careers of many members of the public relations industry.[83] From early in the company's history, employees were expected to participate in ongoing training. Due to this practice, Harold Burson estimated in the early 1980s that 65 percent of the company's costs were related to human resources.[84] The aim of Burson-Marsteller's training was to create a uniform approach to public relations across all clients and locations.[33] In 2005, the company launched Burson-Marsteller University, providing comprehensive training to its executives in developing corporate communications that are consistent worldwide while remaining culturally appropriate.[85] In 2009, when the firm debuted a new approach to public relations called "Evidence-Based Communications", Burson-Marsteller also introduced an extensive training program designed to help employees apply it to ongoing projects and new proposals.[86] Specific training was also provided to employees relevant to their practice areas. In the Issues & Crisis Group, employees were trained to communicate the correct information during crises for a variety of different clients and issues.[19] In an interview in 2003, Harold Burson was quoted as saying that Burson-Marsteller has been "...a training ground for the industry",[2] with more than 35,000 people continuing to participate in the company's alumni network as of 2010[update].[87] Notable former employees at Burson-Marsteller include: Thomas Nides, the U.S. Deputy Secretary of State; Lord Watson of Richmond, a member of the House of Lords; Perry Yeatman, senior vice president of corporate affairs at Kraft Foods; Kathryn Beiser, vice president of corporate communications at Discover Financial Services; Bob Feldman and Jeff Hunt, co-founders and principals of PulsePoint Group communications consultancy;[83] and Daniel Lamarre, CEO of Cirque du Soleil[88] and prominent figures in a number of PR companies, including the CEOs of Ketchum Inc.,[83] Cohn & Wolfe and Wunderman. Crisis managementThrough its crisis management work, Burson-Marsteller was identified with many major corporate crises of the past half-century.[11][89] Burson-Marsteller added crisis management as a service following Young & Rubicam's 1979 takeover of the company. In 2008, Burson-Marsteller established a global practice called the Issues & Crisis Group (ICG) that focus specifically on this area of communications.[90] The In addition to helping clients deal with crises as they occur, Burson-Marsteller also provided clients with assistance in developing contingency plans for potential crises.[89] The firm provided intelligence reports to clients either hourly or daily that advise of new issues, public reception, and critical or supportive responses[91] and carried out market research into CEO and corporate reputation.[92] Burson-Marsteller offered services including communications tools and techniques intended to help companies to recover following a crisis.[89] In particular, Burson-Marsteller The company Since the early 1980s, Burson-Marsteller had dealt with a range of much-publicized crisis management situations, from industrial accidents to acts of terrorism. Notable early cases include work involving the 1982 and 1986 Tylenol contaminations and the Bhopal disaster. TylenolBurson-Marsteller's handling of the Chicago Tylenol poisonings for Johnson & Johnson in September 1982 has been referred to as the "gold standard" for crisis management.[96] Seven people in the Chicago area were killed when they took Tylenol capsules tainted with cyanide,[97] and Johnson & Johnson went to Burson-Marsteller for advice on how to approach the situation.[98] After an eighth death, which occurred in California, the response by Johnson & Johnson was to announce a nationwide recall of all Tylenol capsules.[97] Burson-Marsteller organized a press conference televised across 35 markets in the United States, addressing the recall and reporting that the product tampering had occurred on the shelves, not during manufacturing.[16][19] During late October 1982, a brief television campaign was undertaken asking for the public to trust Tylenol,[99] and Burson-Marsteller carried out nationwide polling which found that the majority of the population still had confidence in Johnson & Johnson.[20] Ninety percent of respondents stated that they did not hold the manufacturer responsible for the deaths.[99] At a Burson-Marsteller organized press conference in November 1982, Johnson & Johnson introduced new tamper-proof packaging,[99] becoming the first company to introduce triple-sealed packaging, which later became the industry standard.[16] The conference gave Johnson & Johnson the opportunity to announce that they were reintroducing Tylenol capsules to the market and would replace any Tylenol that consumers had thrown away.[99][100] In addition, Johnson & Johnson published advertisements with coupons for consumers to use in replacing Tylenol that had been thrown out[99] and produced commercials and print advertisements thanking the public for their "continuing confidence and support".[100] Within six weeks of the introduction of the repackaged product Tylenol's sales returned to the previous level.[16] In 1983, Burson-Marsteller was awarded a Silver Anvil for "out-of-the-ordinary crisis management" for its work with Johnson & Johnson.[101] The company was brought back to handle crisis management during a second Tylenol crisis, involving cyanide tainting in New York in 1986.[96] BhopalThe Bhopal disaster was one of the world's worst industrial catastrophes. In 1984 a gas leak killed over 2,000 people at a plant in Bhopal, India, and poisoned thousands more.[102] The plant was jointly owned by Union Carbide Corporation, now Dow Chemicals, and the Indian government, and run by local Indian management. Burson-Marsteller consultants were brought in by Union Carbide to organize communications following the leak and provide advice to Union Carbide executives.[103] Specifically, the company set up an information center to provide information to the media and help to transmit news from the remote location to newspaper, TV and radio outlets,[11] and facilitate daily press conferences that reported on steps taken following the accident. Under advice from the consultants and corporate lawyers, Union Carbide CEO Warren Anderson traveled to Bhopal where he was placed in custody by the Indian government. Anderson posted bail, returned to the United States, and refused to return to India. He was declared a fugitive from justice by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhopal on 1 February 1992, for failing to appear at the court hearings in a culpable homicide case in which he was named the chief defendant.[104] While his visit to India several days after the leak was viewed positively by the media and other corporations and brought attention to Union Carbide's actions in showing its concern for what had happened in Bhopal[105] it didn't deflect criticism of Union Carbide for cutting costs on safety measures.[106] While Burson-Marsteller has been criticized for its involvement with Union Carbide, Harold Burson has stated that he is proud of the company's work in helping the media cover the story.[21] Other casesAfter the Three Mile Island accident of 1979 became the most significant accident in the history of U.S. commercial nuclear power generation, Burson-Marsteller conducted public relations work for Babcock & Wilcox, the plant's manufacturer.[107] The company organized a campaign for Egypt's Ministry of Tourism following terrorist attacks on tourists in 1993. The campaign focused on Western Europe and the United States, and featured TV commercials and other media coverage of new archeological discoveries and the role of Egypt in the Middle East.[35] Blackwater USA, the private military company, took on Burson-Marsteller's subsidiary company BKSH to help founder Erik Prince prepare for a congressional hearing in 2007. In September of that year, Blackwater guards were involved in a shooting in Baghdad in which 13 Iraqis were killed. Blackwater faced a large amount of negative publicity and Prince was asked to give testimony to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.[108] Corporate PRBurson-Marsteller's second-largest practice was its Corporate and Financial Communications group.[109] The company's corporate PR practice focused on four different specialties: corporate brand positioning, financial communications, organizational performance, and C-suite positioning.[110] TechnologyBurson-Marsteller first established a technology group in its New York office in the early 1980s, specializing in "high-tech PR services".[115] The company's technology practice expanded rapidly over the 1990s with major clients including Apple, Sun Microsystems and Qualcomm and its headquarters moved to Silicon Valley in the late 1990s. The practice focused specifically on public relations for technology companies[116][117] and organizations using technology as a key part of their business.[118] Notable clients included HP,[119] Intel[120] and business software corporation SAP AG.[121] Public affairsWithin Burson-Marsteller's public affairs practice, the company specialized in public relations and communications for government and corporate clients.[122] Notable public affairs clients RomaniaBurson-Marsteller represented the Romanian government in the early 1970s, during which time the country gained Most Favored Nation status for trade with the United States. At the time the United States and other western nations regarded Romania's president Nicolae Ceauşescu as the friendliest of the Soviet bloc leaders to their interests. U.S. President Nixon visited Ceauşescu in Bucharest in 1969, which he viewed as a diplomatic opportunity to gain access to China,[129] and later the Romanian dictator was said to be instrumental in arranging Nixon's visit to China. Burson-Marsteller was brought in by the Romanian government specifically to promote trade and tourism for Romania; one result was a weeklong visit to the country by NBC's Today program.[127] IndonesiaFollowing the 1991 Santa Cruz massacre of East Timor protesters by occupying Indonesian forces, the Indonesian government retained Burson-Marsteller[130][131][132] "to help improve the country's human rights and environmental image", according to the Far Eastern Economic Review. Another contract was signed in 1996.[133]The company was retained in total from 1992 to 1998.[130][134] ArgentinaBurson-Marsteller carried out public relations work for the last Argentine military dictatorship (1976–1983), for which it received criticism.[81] The corporation accepted the military junta government of General Jorge Videla as a client with the full knowledge of and advice from the U.S. State Department, For years Burson-Marsteller denied working directly with the Argentine military, stating they only worked for the Ministry of Economics to assist in economic development. Later on, Burson-Marsteller admitted to working with the dictator to improve the nation's image. [138] At that time human rights organizations were denouncing state crimes against humanity including forced disappearances and torture that were taking place in what later became known as the Dirty War. Burson-Marsteller Naomi Klein wrote in The Shock Doctrine that Burson-Marsteller account executive Victor Emmanuel stated that violence was necessary to open up Argentina's economy since securing investment was impossible if a state of civil war existed, and that while acknowledging that "a lot of innocent people were probably killed", "given the situation, immense force was required".[141] The quotes are drawn from a 1996 interview by Marguerite Feitlowitz. In her account of that interview, Feitlowitz describes Emmanuel replying to a point about kidnappings and secret camps: "It was arguably almost necessary."[142] Feitlowitz describes an initial 33-page report completed under Emmanuel's supervision as echoing the regime's language, referencing, for example, "well-financed subversion campaigns of international origin." The report outlined three target groups for their campaign: "those who influence thinking," "those who influence travel," and "those who influence investment." She goes on to write:
Burson-Marsteller placed an advertising supplement in The New York Times Magazine in 1979; according to Emmanuel, content was probably supplied by the Argentine finance minister. A more extensive 31-page supplement ran in Business Week the next July.[142] Evidence from Wikileaks revealed in 2013 that Burson-Marsteller pressured the Associated Press to publish an article with an American executive mentioning their support for the regime in 1976. [138] According to Feitlowitz, Argentine dictator Jorge Videla renewed Burson-Marsteller's contract twice.[142] UkraineIn 2012, Burson-Marsteller was hired by Ukraine's ruling Party of Regions (PoR), "to help the PoR communicate its activities as the governing party of Ukraine, as well as to help it explain better its position on the Yulia Tymoshenko case", as explained by Robert Mack, a senior manager at Burson-Marsteller.[143] The tasks of the PR company included setting up press interviews for Ukraine's deputy prosecutor general, Renat Kuzmin, during his visits in Brussels. Kuzmin has been criticised for his direct accusations to Tymoshenko, including for a 1990s contract killing, helping to violate Kuzmin's status as an independent jurist. Other PR companies The public relations contract coincided with a government campaign against former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, detained in a penal colony, and whose case has been top in the agenda of EU-Ukraine relations, delaying the signature of a DCFTA and Association Agreement between the two. TurkeyIn May 2017, shortly before clashes at the Turkish Ambassador's Residence in Washington, D.C., the Turkish administration of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan became a client of the agency. An enquiry by journalists of Spiegel regarding the hiring by the Turkish government remained unanswered by Burson-Marsteller.[144] HealthcareBurson-Marsteller established its Healthcare practice in the 1980s and by the early 1990s was listed as the top ranked healthcare PR firm by O'Dwyer's PR Services Report.[145] The company's healthcare practice provided public relations and communications for clients in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, healthcare provider, policy, nutrition, cosmetics and consumer health markets.[146] Google smear campaignIt became public knowledge that Burson-Marsteller had been soliciting negative articles about Google's privacy practices after security researcher Christopher Soghoian re-posted a pitch[150] he received from a company representative. Other influential outlets, including USA Today,[151] confirmed that they had received similar pitches and even offers for help in writing article content. It was soon discovered by The Daily Beast that Google-competitor Facebook had hired the firm[152] to promote press coverage critical of Google's practices, although the firm did not initially divulge to writers who had paid for their services. This was confirmed by Facebook itself shortly after. Two former reporters who had Burson-Marsteller Brand marketingBurson-Marsteller's Cohn & WolfeHistoryCohn & Wolfe was a global communications & public relations firm. In 1984, Burson-Marsteller acquired the Atlanta-based public relations firm,[158] and it operated as a subsidiary of Burson-Marsteller until 2000. It was part of Young & Rubicam and then also a part of WPP. In 2018, it merged with Burson-Marsteller.[159] It was founded by Bob Cohn and Norman Wolfe in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1970. In 1999 the firm managed the campaign for Paxil, a drug produced by GlaxoSmithKline.[160][161] The firm also ran a publicity campaign on social anxiety disorder[160][161] which made Paxil the world's top-selling anti-depressant.[160][161] References
|
Just a reminder: I am also working on a new "History" section, which explains the creation of Burson Cohn & Wolfe, and an "Operations" section to outline BCW's current operations. Thank you! BCW Editor (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- I've implemented the changes, which have also been review by other editors above. My one concern was the edits now mean that sections that were present-tense operations are now past-tense history. In places there are arguments for and against such a division. Much of that content is relevant to the ongoing operation, but the content is there and readers can decide for themselves what is truly history, and which represents current practice (in continuity with the previous entities). Klbrain (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Request for New History Section
Hi, everyone! I have another request for editors to consider. As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance here.
Above, I have asked for the article's "History" section to be broken into two sections with the headings "Burson-Marsteller" and "Cohn & Wolfe" to make it clearer which information in the article relates to the predecessor companies, rather than BCW. I've now also prepared this proposed short and simple "History" section to provide a summary of the history specifically for the new company, Burson Cohn & Wolfe. I truly believe that this request and the one above will help clarify this article in the wake of the merger of Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe.
"History" draft
|
---|
BCW traces its roots to the founding of Burson-Marsteller in 1953 and Cohn & Wolfe in 1970. As part of a restructuring strategy, in 2018 parent company WPP plc merged Burson-Marsteller, the sixth-largest PR firm worldwide, and Cohn & Wolfe, which ranked 12th.[1] The merger created the third-largest PR firm, which was named BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe).[2] WPP stated that it merged the firms due to their complementary skills, including Burson-Marsteller's public affairs and corporate work and Cohn & Wolfe's digital creative content, consumer, and health care work.[3] In August 2018, BCW acquired HZ, an integrated creative agency, headquartered in Rockville, Maryland with additional offices in Baltimore, Los Angeles, New York and Washington, D.C.[2][4] References
|
I really appreciate you considering this request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- That's reasonable; and see the section above. Klbrain (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Final request to restrcture following merge
Hello! I have another request for editors to consider, and then this article should be much more clear following the merge. There are three parts to this request, but it is all connected, so I think it makes sense to look at it together. As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance here. User:Klbrain: Thank you so much for reviewing and making the changes I requested above. Can you consider these updates, too?
- The standalone "Services" section is now redundant, since there is an edited version of this within the new "Burson-Marsteller" section, reflecting that this is historical information relating specifically to Burson-Marsteller. Please can you consider deleting the duplicative standalone "Services" section?
- To replace the standalone "Services" section mentioned above, I wrote a proposed new section called "Operations", which is specific to the new company following the merger. I should note that I did not include Burson Cohn & Wolfe Chairman Don Baer in my draft because it was just announced that he is stepping down at the end of the year. I didn't want to seek to add something that would need updating by editors so soon.
"Operations" draft
|
---|
BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe) is the world's third-largest PR firm by revenue, as of 2018.[1] It employs more than 4,000 people in 42 countries.[2] Donna Imperato serves as global chief executive officer (CEO).[2] She was previously CEO at Cohn & Wolfe.[3] BCW is split into divisions by geographic region: North America, Latin America, Europe & Africa, Middle East, and Asia-Pacific. Each region is led by a regional president who reports directly to the global CEO.[4] BCW is part of the BCW Group, whose brands also include AxiCom, BWR, Direct Impact, GCI Health, HZ, PSB, Prime Policy Group, and Y&R PR.[5][6][7] BCW offers clients creative content and integrated communications services across the following sectors: business-to-business, consumer, corporate, crisis management, corporate social responsibility, healthcare, public affairs, and technology.[8] Other notable employees include Karen Hughes, former senior aide to U.S. President George W. Bush.[9] References
|
- In addition, can you please consider adding Brian Ellner to the "See also" section?
I really appreciate you considering this request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 19:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- User:Darx9url and User:Coffeeandcrumbs: Checking to see if either or both of you can review this final final request to complete this merge of the Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe articles. Thank you for your consideration! BCW Editor (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Edit Request
Hello! To simplify my above request to finalize this article merger, I will break it up into separate edit requests, seeking one at a time. Hopefully that will be easier for editors to review and implement if appropriate. Following these requests, the article should be much more clear. As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm being extra cautious and not finishing up these edits myself.
Request to delete duplicate section
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
The standalone "Services" section is now redundant, since there is an edited version of this information now within the new "Burson-Marsteller" section, reflecting that this is historical information relating specifically to Burson-Marsteller. Please, can editors consider deleting the duplicative standalone "Services" section?
I really appreciate you considering this request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 22:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- The axiom that too many cooks spoil the broth comes to mind here. Please ping the editor(s) who initially implemented the requested changes which introduced this duplicate text. Since they implemented them, they are in the best position to fix any duplicate text created as the result of said changes. You yourself stated that
There are three parts to this request, but it is all connected, so I think it makes sense to look at it together.
That would involve contacting the prior editors who made those changes.[a] In the unlikely event that you do not hear back from any of them after a reasonable amount of time, please re-open the request. Thank you! Regards, Spintendo 02:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Notes
- ^ Contact should be attempted on both the editor's own talk pages and the article's talk page.
Request for new Operations section
User:GenQuest: Thank you for deleting the duplicative standalone "Services" section. With the standalone "Services" section removed, I propose a new section called "Operations" to go above "History". My "Operations" draft (below) is specific to the new company following the merger. I should note that I did not include Burson Cohn & Wolfe Chairman Don Baer in my draft because it was just announced that he is stepping down at the end of the year. I didn't want to seek to add something that would need updating by editors so soon. Per User:Spintendo's note, I do not want "too many cooks [to] spoil the broth". User:GenQuest: Can you review this request as well?
"Operations" draft
|
---|
BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe) is the world's third-largest PR firm by revenue, as of 2018.[1] It employs more than 4,000 people in 42 countries.[2] Donna Imperato serves as global chief executive officer (CEO).[2] She was previously CEO at Cohn & Wolfe.[3] BCW is split into divisions by geographic region: North America, Latin America, Europe & Africa, Middle East, and Asia-Pacific. Each region is led by a regional president who reports directly to the global CEO.[4] BCW is part of the BCW Group, whose brands also include AxiCom, BWR, Direct Impact, GCI Health, HZ, PSB, Prime Policy Group, and Y&R PR.[5][6][7] BCW offers clients creative content and integrated communications services across the following sectors: business-to-business, consumer, corporate, crisis management, corporate social responsibility, healthcare, public affairs, and technology.[8] Other notable employees include Karen Hughes, former senior aide to U.S. President George W. Bush.[9] References
|
I really appreciate you considering this request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- This has been done. BCW Editor (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Request for addition to "See also"
User:GenQuest: Thank you for adding the new "Operations" section. Can you please consider adding Brian Ellner to the "See also" section?
I really appreciate you considering this request. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)