Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 December 17

December 17

File:Love Is a Long Road (Tom Petty song).jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the actual cover of "Love is a long road". It's never been released as a single. The source image apparently is Spotify, where no release under the name "Love is a Long Road" by Tom Petty appears to have this cover. And so, it is a fake and should be deleted. Bedivere (talk) 00:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this image, it's the official Spotify image. Eric Carpenter (talk) 15:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what's your source? I did not find it anywhere. Seems made up. Bedivere (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image was posted on Tom Petty's official Twi-, err, X about a week ago. [1] Ixfd64 (talk) 18:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but as it's been said below, it's the cover of a playlist, not the song. It is misleading, still Bedivere (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. (Ping Bedivere and Eric Carpenter) This seems to be the official image for Petty's playlist "Love Is a Long Road", but not the song, which is what the article is about. See the playlist on Spotify. I also found the picture on his X/Twitter and Instagram, both of which are used to promote the playlist, not song. So it isn't exactly fake, just outside the scope of the article. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 18:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not the actual artwork specifically for the song so it is actually misleading. -- Whpq (talk) 20:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jacques Nicolas Billaud-Varenne engraving.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Billaud-Varenne gravure.jpg on Commons. ✗plicit 07:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in favour of the Commons image. -- Whpq (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:$NEWSP.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested PROD. Used on Top News next to File:$NEWSP-2023.jpg. My PROD concern was: "Fails WP:NFCC3 as excessive use of non-free content. File:$NEWSP-2023.jpg is already used for the same purposes in the same section, and seeing both images does not increase the reader's understanding of the subject. The difference between the appearance in 2018 and 2023 is not subject to sourced commentary. (so also fails WP:NFCC8 per WP:NFC#CS)" Uploader's contest summary was: "The reason there are two images in the $NEWSP part of Top News, is because I want users to realize that the command still exists, even in the new layout (January 1st 2021 - present)." I still do not understand how seeing both versions of the image is contextually significant. The section where the files are used cites only a primary source and possibly constitutes original research. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 18:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The entire section is trivial, non-notable information and should be removed. Both this and File:$NEWSP-2023.jpg should be deleted. Aspects (talk) 15:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These both were supposed to be added as proof that the "$NEWSP" command was actually used to update news information at the bottom part of the layout. The reason why the 2023 version is also uploaded is because I want to upload proof that it still exists to this day even with the new layout.

I hope that this comment could prevent deletion of both images. RVBILLIS-99 (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is not what the stated purpose is. If it is being used as a reference, then you just add a link to an external site a reference. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:NFCC#8. As I noted above, it not appropriate to use in the article as a reference, and it looks to be used to illustrate trivia. -- Whpq (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the images from the page and used a reference instead. You have the right to delete "$NEWSP.jpg" and "$NEWSP-2023.jpg" since as of now there is a reference already used.

My apologies for this confusion caused.

Best wishes, RVBILLIS-99 (talk) 17:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please delete both images ($NEWSP and $NEWSP-2023) from Wikipedia since a reference is already used instead. RVBILLIS-99 (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grilled cheesus sandwich.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no significant sourced commentary about this image to satisfy WP:NFCC#8. There is only unsourced mention of the face of Jesus on a grilled cheese sandwich in the plot. Whpq (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 21:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.