Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Failed log/March 2011

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contributor(s): M3tal H3ad, Anger22, Burningclean, Gary king, Igordebraga, me

"The Unforgiven(s)" --Nergaal (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Metallica band members/archive1. Nergaal (talk) 22:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I meant individual members' bios. Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, when it had the list of members the "overview topic" would be flawless. But since it doesn´t exist anymore, it feels "empty, they say" without people from the band itself (and to make it worse, all the band member articles are nowhere near GA level). On the fence with this one. igordebraga 20:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I can't take a stance one way or the other, but as the "director" of topics it doesn't feel right to me promoting the article without the band members, or at the very least the current ones. I'll leave that up to other commenters but that's just my thought. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Route 63

[edit]

This topic relates to Pennsylvania Route 63 and all its current and former related routes in Southeastern Pennsylvania, which are all GAs. PA 232 is included as it includes the former PA 163. PA 763 redirects to the main PA 63 article as it only existed for a short time. Dough4872 03:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support works for me. Meets all requirements, and all are good articles. --AdmrBoltz 03:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to be able to support this, but I really can't at this time. I've reviewed the articles, and although they meet the Good Article criteria, I can't consider them "good articles" with a clear conscience. Many paragraphs in many of the articles are excessively long. Four of the articles are missing maps, and the two that have maps don't have captions for them. Five of the articles don't have a reference for the establishment date in the infobox, and PA 363 doesn't have the date in the infobox at all. The topic meets the GTC, but I can't consider this to be one of the best topics on Wikipedia as the articles are currently comprised. – TMF 03:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]