Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Russell Lee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2024 at 14:15:23 (UTC)

Original – Photographer Russell Lee, in about 1942.
Alt 1
Reason
Another in a series of photographs of photographers. There are a couple other options (e.g. File:Russell-Lee-FSA.jpg), but this one was by far the most widely used, and the one that looked the worst in the old version. I'd say the crop is fairly conservative: I didn't crop any of him (except maybe a few pixels at the bottom: edges aren't perfectly straight), but did take a smidgen more off the right to centre him, and cropped the weird... reflection? damage? intruding lights? at the top, which still has more than ample headspace. (Compare File:Portrait of Russell Lee, FSA (Farm Security Administration) photographer - Original.tif)
Articles in which this image appears
Russell Lee (photographer) +2
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator
Farm Security Administration/Office of War Information, restored by Adam Cuerden
Haha. But that out of focus areas really do bother me. It's an excellent shot with good EV. But since we don't have a time machine lying around in a hot tub to fix that focus issues, Oppose. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair, but, y'know, sharpening doesn't really work with film grain, and Charles would be here to oppose if I crop his legs out. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 05:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald and Janke: How about the alt? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 02:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • True, but in both these photos I see a focusing error. A grainy photo can also be sharp. --Janke | Talk 09:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Honestly, I suspect there's somewhat of an issue in the 40s of them knowing what images were being used for. No need to get an amazing perfect focus in an image that's never going to be seen bigger than about 6" (15cm) tall at most, or is going to be halftone printed. 1910-1950 is kind of a nadir of photography, so I'd say the second, especially, is decent for the era. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 12:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 15:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]