Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 22

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep , as reasons for deletion have been mostly nullified. NPASR provided other rationale given. Primefac (talk) 14:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with mostly plaintext and redlinks. WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep , as reasons for nomination have been mostly nullified. NPASR provided other rationale given. Primefac (talk) 14:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with mostly plaintext and redlinks. WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 30. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with only 5 links (WP:EXISTING) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose: Just because it is unused doesn't make it a candidate for deletion. The team still existed and that navbox does have some links that can be used and maybe more could be made. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I'll ignore the fact that it is unused after 5 years. The only real links are Delhi Waveriders, with "Details" being another link to that article, and the supplementary links to owner and stadium, which should not count for the minimum required as those are very minor links. Leaving a side the fact that the captain link data is incorrect, it is also not included in other sports navbox, as team members are not included in those templates, including the captain. "All articles" is not an article link, but a category link masquerading as one. So that's 1 + 2 minor links. --Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:58, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Redundant to {{Districts of South Laos}} & {{Districts of North Laos}} which are in widespread use. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with it?? Common sense to use a nav box linking all districts of a country.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The problem that it duplicates the other templates on the same exact set of pages. --Gonnym (talk) 00:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant – all songs and albums in this template redirect to the artist's page as they are all not notable. Richard3120 (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox that is far from complete. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 6 links Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with only 5 links Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox about defunct sports league Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 4 links. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox violating WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 3 links. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant – all recordings listed in the template by this artist are non-notable and have been redirected to the artst's article. The only articles still existing are the compilation album (on which she contributes one song) and the four related articles at the bottom, none of which are directly about the artist. Richard3120 (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox for players of a team from 10 years ago. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with mostly redlinks. WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 2. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 23:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox violating WP:EXISTING. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Now in use (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Updated and added to 4 pages (the other 2 were no longer Active/Alternative/Modern Rock formatted). Help, don't hinder. - NeutralhomerTalk • 18:16 on March 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Comment: Zackmann08: I added a few more as well. This all took me 20 minutes, if that. Don't just nominate things for deletion, it helps no one. Actually take the time and contribute to the project. - NeutralhomerTalk • 18:28 on March 23, 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that links different images. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The conference folded and I have removed the linked pages per WP:CFB. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and massive list navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As creator, I agree to delete it as we now use a link to List of IOC country codes instead. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after I replaced it in 2014–15 Nemzeti Bajnokság I Frietjes (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 30. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant template. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to subpage. The consensus here is to "subst and delete", but in the case of WP-space pages like this the general method of having these tables and/or navigation spaces is to do it as a subpage to keep the main essay a little "cleaner". Thus, there is a small amount of administrative override to keep things "clean". Primefac (talk) 23:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template is only used in the essay Wikipedia:Processes. As such, it is not a navigation template but instead a table summary of links relating to the topics discussed in the essay, and therefore is only useful—as a particular collection of those links—in that essay. So I propose substituting the template into the essay and then deleting the template. Bsherr (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox WP:EXISTING violation Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox for former places Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox violating WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Important parts (winners and runner-ups) are already linked via {{Bigg Boss}}. No need for a navbox with every name in it. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 30. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused out of date navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and overly complex navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with only 2 links Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navboxes violating WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navboxes with no parent article. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. An admin WP:T3ed the template so no reason to keep the discussion open. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with only 4 links Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused MASSIVE navbox. WP:NENAN & WP:NAVBOXCREEP Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar template. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with redlinks and plaintext. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. S.A. Julio (talk) 16:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 30. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that just links the board of a company. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox redundant to {{Government of Albania}} which is widely used. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with mostly plaintext. Doesn't provide useful navigation. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 30. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused MASSIVE navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with mostly redlinks. WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. S.A. Julio (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox violating WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox that is redundant to {{Connecticut}} Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that is basically a fan joke... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with only redlinks. WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused and very specific navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These were created in 2016, are completely unused, and I don't think that they are useful for the goal of this project Dirk Beetstra T C 07:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I initially created them here but they are only really implemented on Wikiversity. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 10:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:LINKSTOAVOID #4 we should not be encouraging linking out to pages (in this case Patreon) that only serve to crowdfund money for the article's subject. Stephen 04:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was convert to wrapper of {{Infobox television episode}}, making sure all of the unique fields are kept in the final version. Primefac (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Simpsons episode with Template:Infobox television episode.
Infobox Simpsons episode is one of only two episode infoboxes that have a separate show-specific infobox. In being a separate infobox, the template has not been kept up-to-date with the changes of the main episode infobox:

  1. Missing the |teleplay= and |story= parameters, which episodes such as "Black Widower" and "'Round Springfield" should use.
  2. Missing the |multi_episodes= parameter, which episodes such as "The Great Phatsby" should use.
  3. Missing |photographer=, |editor= and |runtime=.
  4. Missing short description.
  5. Non-standard episode numbering - while ~10k articles use a numbering style which is based on the episode number of a current season (as in season 30, episode 2), this uses the total number of episode in the show (as in 641). This gives much less context to the reader and there is no reason to deviate from the norm here.
  6. Inadequate documentation (including no TemplateData).
  7. No real maintainers, as can be seen from Category:Pages using infobox Simpsons episode with unknown parameters, compared to {{Infobox episode}}'s category.

Additionally, this infobox has some unique features not present in {{Infobox episode}}:

  1. A complete season episode list - which per this discussion has been removed from all episode infoboxes and should be removed from this one.
  2. A complete season list which should be removed as well, as it duplicates the season list that already appears in the navbox template at the bottom of every episode article.
  3. Using |show runner= parameter instead of a |producer= parameter, which per a recent discussion consensus seem to be against having a show runner parameter in the infobox.
  4. 3 unique parameters - |blackboard=, |couch gag= and |commentary=. The 3 unique parameters can either be added to the standard episode infobox, be used in a sub-infobox template or be removed. It's worth noting that a lot of other TV series have unique episode-specific features, which aren't represented in the infobox: Lost could have "Flashback/Flash-Forward/Flash-Sideways", "Featured character" and "Day" parameters; Star Trek: The Original Series can have a "Star date" parameter. The Simpsons is not a unique show in this aspect. Worth noting that the "Featured character" for Lost and the "Star date" for Star Trek: The Original Series are already represented in their episode list tables (yet are absent from the infobox). Gonnym (talk) 11:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rewrite the base template to allow custom parameters and make the Simpsons template transclude the television template with those custom parameters accounted for. We also have to take Who Shot Mr. Burns? into account as a multi-part episode that is stretched between two seasons. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 00:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 09:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Been sitting untouched for a few weeks...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retain the Unique Fields Somehow Given the long run of the show and its unique aspects that have received widespread coverage, the unique fields should be maintained. I don't particularly care how. Smartyllama (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).