Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 25

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 25, 2020.

1918 pandelection

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any evidence of this term being used this way. Delete unless evidence can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2020 pandelection

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Searching online, most results seem to be Azerbaijani news sources commenting on an upcoming election in Nagorno Karabakh. I would suggest deletion due to a lack of broad usage by RS (and note that we don't seem to have an article for this upcoming election). signed, Rosguill talk 20:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

No Drama Obama

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Public image of Barack Obama#Temperament. per WP:SNOW. Very clear consensus to retarget here. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Delete unless the redirect is both mentioned and explained on either this article or somewhere else. OcelotCreeper (talk) 20:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mighty Thor: Battle Royal

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Google tells me this somehow related to Nendoroid, and so my best guess is that this is a specific edition of those plastic figures. There is no information about it on Wikipedia at present, it's not the sort of thing that is likely to be encyclopaedic and Google searches do not suggest this is an exception. Thryduulf (talk) 10:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thor sequel

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Thor (film)#Sequels. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now that a few years have passed, this could also mean Thor: Ragnarok or the upcoming Love and Thunder film. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Public Service (TV series)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Public Service (TV series)

Anial sex

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Anial sex

Shit fuck

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marmango

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. According to the page history, the user said it was a term for Anal sex in Greek and Greek-American ceremonies. Delete unless the term is both mentioned and explained in the article. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Knobbly stick

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fudgepack

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect per discussion. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 08:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butt stuff

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Butt stuff

Butsecks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep all but "Buttsachs".
-- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Questioning the usefulness of these redirects. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bum Secks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:13, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Questioning these redirects purpose. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anal secks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Questioning the use of these redirects. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anal queen

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 14:03, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anal queen

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep without prejudice. Please resubmit, bundling only highly related terms together. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search terms. Delete all unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all without prejudice against renomination individually or in small like-minded groups. This is a very wide range of redirects here, most of which look to be more-or-less plausible spelling errors and synonyms. -- Tavix (talk) 16:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all without prejudice per Tavix. At first glance I see some that should clearly redirect here (e.g. Butt stuff), some that should clearly redirect somewhere but this may or may not be the best article (e.g. Anal queen), some that seem dubious (e.g. Anial sex), and some I have no idea about without research (e.g. Marmango). Thryduulf (talk) 17:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Do you think these should be bundled separately? OcelotCreeper (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • There are some that are cearly related, e.g. "Fudgepack", "Fudgepacker" and "Fudgepacking" are probably fine to be bundled together but do some WP:BEFORE to check this. Same with others that are very clearly related and your research indicates that there is no reason to treat them separately. Just looking at the list I'd say there should be a minimum of 10 separate nomniations here if you intend to nominate them all, posisbly more depending on what the outcome of your investiagions prior to nominating are - 1 (Anal queen), 2 (Anal secks, Anal seks, Analsecks), 3 (Bum Secks, Bumsecks, Bumsecks, Bumseks), 4 (Butsecks, Buttsecks, Butt secks, Butsachs, Buttseks), 5 (Butt stuff), 6 (Fudgepack, Fudgepacker, Fudgepacking), 7 (Knobbly stick), 8 (Marmango, Marmango dance), 9 (Shit fuck), 10 (Anial sex). Thryduulf (talk) 17:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree these should be deleted, 14-16 aren't synonyms of the target, they are anti-gay slurs. jamacfarlane (talk) 18:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close and renominate per Thryduulf. WP:TRAINWRECK right now. I think Butt stuff would probably be kept, so maybe don't renominate that one. Hog Farm (talk) 18:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Caragdûr

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This, which is listed as a "redirect with possibilities", is an obscure cliff in Middle-earth. Currently not mentioned anywhere. In the fictional history, the cliff is only notable for a character being thrown off of the cliff, said character had their article deleted in March. Hog Farm (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dagmor

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dagmor is a Middle-earth weapon Wikipedia no longer has any content about; this has outlived its usefulness. Hog Farm (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Borondir

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Very minor figure, probably out of scope to mention anywhere. Hog Farm (talk) 15:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

VW

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. You are requesting a move, which is done at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please see the arguments below before proceeding with an RM though. -- Tavix (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move VW (disambiguation) to VW. I hardly see Volkswagen simply referred to as VW. The dab page should be at VW, not VW (disambiguation). Also Volkswagen doesn't call itself VW. Logo fixer (talk) 15:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep this has tons of incoming links, I checked the first twenty and they are all meaning the current target. Every single result on the first 5 pages of a google search for "VW" are about Volkswagen, which does refer to itself as "VW" - see e.g. My VW on the official UK website, VW Vans & Commercial Vehicles official UK website. This is one of the clearest cases of primary topic you'll ever see. With over 350 hits in the month before nomination and over 7500 last year, this should RfD should be speedily closed as disruptive. Thryduulf (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep - this is a very widely known and used abbreviation (whether pronounced "fau veh" or "vee doubleyou"), both on and off the web. It's correctly targeted right now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tomb of Elendil

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While Elendil is mentioned in many places, Wikipedia has no content about his tomb. Hog Farm (talk) 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rav Rabbah

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:13, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Rav part is not mentioned in the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --TheImaCow (talk) 14:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Rav is a standard honorific for rabbis. An additional complication to consider here is that there have been other rabbis known as Rav Rabbah; the stub that was created at this title was attempting to refer to one that was part of the Geonim (and had a source that stated that there were actually two rabbis named Rabbah among the geonim). Disambiguation is possible, but I think that until we have a duly sourced mention at Geonim, the status quo of pointing to Rabbah bar Nahmani and having a hatnote from there to Geonim is best. signed, Rosguill talk 22:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Myself an avid student of Jewish law etc., I never heard of such a combination "Rav Rabbah". Debresser (talk) 12:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think. The name "Rabbah" in Rabbah bar Nahmani was likely a contraction of "Rav/Rabbi Abba", so the name "Rav Rabbah" would be nonsensical in relation to him. Ar2332 (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beacon Communications

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Beacon Communications

Hurricane Henriette (2001)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#Hurricane Henriette (2001)

Sharktooth Hill

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Sharktooth Hill

Order of the Golden Lion

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Order of the Lion. -- Tavix (talk) 13:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should redirect to either Order of the Gold Lion of the House of Nassau, which is the more important of the orders of the Golden Lion,[1][2][3] or to Order of the Lion as incomplete disambiguation. DrKay (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 06:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Article the Third

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Article Three and edited the said dab page to include the original target of this redirect. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 11:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a historical name for this (see [4]), however, it's fairly ambiguous with Article Three of the United States Constitution. Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 06:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CCP virus

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic#Chinese biological weapon. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

It is a They are non-neutral names of the SARS-CoV-2, not the 2020 pandemic. Therefore, retarget to SARS-CoV-2 misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic#Chinese biological weapon and maintain status quo. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rosguill, the closer of the last discussion, told Soumya-8974 to start a new discussion when they tried to action the retarget themselves. Since the last discussion was focused on whether or not to delete, this one can be limited to a narrower "retarget or keep" discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digital content creation tools

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Digital content creation tools

Ass full of knife

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be a common slang term for the target. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 03:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds more like a WP:NEO than a WP:G10. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sosospider

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 8#Sosospider

(A.M.A)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless and unlikely search term Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_25&oldid=961542872"