Thread:User talk:CodeCat/*kh₂eyd-/reply (11): difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
m remove redundant Unicode bidi marks |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Howdy, Code. Sorry about the Celtic stuff at {{m|ine-pro|*steh₂- |
Howdy, Code. Sorry about the Celtic stuff at {{m|ine-pro|*steh₂-}}. I am perfectly aware that Italo-Celtic is not completely accepted, and I've only used it twice in the past (here and in {{m|ine-pro|*bʰudʰmḗn}}) where the evidence for the proposal seems most convincing. As for the Goidelic/Brythonic business, I wish that had been told to me earlier. I've been using that schema for a little while now because I find it clear; though I take your point about OI being the only Goidelic language. And with ''Brythonic'', I was just using Wikipedia's standard, which created the error. Oops. |
||
Latest revision as of 21:40, 1 March 2023
Howdy, Code. Sorry about the Celtic stuff at *steh₂-. I am perfectly aware that Italo-Celtic is not completely accepted, and I've only used it twice in the past (here and in *bʰudʰmḗn) where the evidence for the proposal seems most convincing. As for the Goidelic/Brythonic business, I wish that had been told to me earlier. I've been using that schema for a little while now because I find it clear; though I take your point about OI being the only Goidelic language. And with Brythonic, I was just using Wikipedia's standard, which created the error. Oops.